Abstract

By adapting methods used to measure anxiety in physical employment interview, this study in the first stage identifies levels of anxiety induced in a computer-mediated interview setting. In the second stage, the study examines the mediating role of practice interview process in reducing interview anxiety and explores the moderating effects of gender and prior work experience on the relationship between remote interview anxiety and performance outcome. It utilizes partial least squares structural equation modeling to test the direct and mediation effect based on 245 responses received from job aspirants. As in a physical interview, anxiety in a remote situation is related to one’s level of preparation and perception of interviewing self-efficacy. The results reveal a significant positive effect of preparation satisfaction on self-efficacy perception of interview performance and significant negative effect of self-efficacy perception and preparation satisfaction on remote interview anxiety. Practice-interview process significantly mediated the performance outcome; however, the moderating effect of gender and work experience was found to be insignificant. Practical implications: Findings from this study have far-reaching implications for educators and professionals working toward mitigating anxiety during the employment selection processes in computer-mediated setting.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2024-06-01
DOI
10.1177/23294906231160672
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 65 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87
  2. 10.1037/a0016532
  3. 10.1108/JMP-09-2018-0398
  4. 10.1086/258724
  5. 10.1108/HESWBL-03-2016-0014
  6. 10.25035/pad.2016.002
  7. 10.1111/peps.12285
  8. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00709.x
  9. 10.2139/ssrn.944907
  10. 10.1037/apl0000266
  11. 10.2753/MTP1069-6679160402
  12. 10.1177/014662168801200410
  13. 10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1080
  14. 10.1111/ijsa.12326
  15. 10.1108/01443330910947534
  16. 10.1108/00400910710754435
  17. 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  18. 10.1111/ijsa.12115
  19. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.030
  20. 10.1177/002224378101800104
  21. 10.1002/berj.3174
  22. 10.17705/1CAIS.01605
  23. 10.1080/08917779008249333
  24. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.012
  25. 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001
  26. 10.1145/3209626.3209707
  27. 10.1177/1080569909336951
  28. 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  29. 10.25035/pad.2017.005
  30. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00671
  31. 10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130103
  32. 10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.05.003
  33. 10.1108/EBHRM-05-2018-0033
  34. 10.1186/1471-244X-14-S1-S1
  35. 10.1037/amp0000716
  36. 10.1111/ijsa.12150
  37. 10.1111/ijsa.12191
  38. 10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100789
  39. 10.1186/s12874-018-0582-y
  40. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00797.x
  41. 10.1002/job.512
  42. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00002.x
  43. 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2005.00325.x
  44. 10.1037/apl0000943
  45. 10.1111/1748-8583.12249
  46. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.03.006
  47. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603632
  48. 10.1023/A:1027349115277
  49. 10.1108/ILS-06-2018-0050
  50. 10.1037/cbs0000108
  51. 10.1108/CDI-04-2018-0119
  52. 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00405.x
  53. 10.1080/1359432X.2020.1817975
  54. 10.1177/1469787414544875
  55. 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002
  56. 10.1037/a0018289
  57. 10.1111/ijsa.12317
  58. 10.1080/00140136008930482
  59. 10.1002/jaba.385
  60. 10.1111/j.1468-232X.1990.tb00752.x
  61. 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_1
  62. 10.1348/096317907X248653
  63. 10.1037/h0036267
  64. 10.1007/978-3-319-49655-9_16
  65. 10.2307/25148667
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →