Abstract

Business communication programs and business school competitions are a prevalent component of graduate-level business education. Both activities help students develop problem-solving skills, critical thinking, high-level communication, and applied experiential learning. While business competitions may aid in the development of advanced communication skills, to date there has been no comparison of the effectiveness of coursework, competitions, or both. Using U.S. News & World Report rankings of the top 100 U.S. MBA programs as a proxy for program quality, we find that business communication coursework provides greater benefits when compared with internal case competitions. Specifically, findings indicate a higher ratio of graduate business communication classes to internal competitions correlated to higher rank. Furthermore, reputational advantage was also associated with required communication coursework and a higher number of internal competitions offered for graduate business student participation.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2019-03-01
DOI
10.1177/2329490618824840
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 38 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/08832323.2010.497819
  2. 10.1080/03797720802522627
  3. 10.1080/08959285.2012.736900
  4. 10.1108/JMD-05-2011-0061
  5. 10.1057/eej.2015.10
  6. 10.1177/108056999605900203
  7. 10.1177/1052562916644284
  8. 10.1080/03634520109379231
  9. 10.1177/1052562905277789
  10. 10.1177/108056990606900207
  11. 10.1007/s10869-009-9140-2
  12. 10.1080/1360080X.2015.1056599
  13. 10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.017
  14. 10.1080/09639284.2011.560763
  15. 10.1080/14703297.2013.832634
  16. 10.1108/02621710310487882
  17. 10.1177/1052562916669965
  18. 10.1080/09639280902719341
  19. 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00245.x
  20. 10.17705/1CAIS.02335
  21. 10.1177/108056999906200403
  22. 10.1177/1080569905277130
  23. 10.1177/0273475316653337
  24. 10.1177/0021943611406276
  25. 10.1177/0273475306297380
  26. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00852.x
  27. 10.3200/JOEB.81.4.201-204
  28. 10.2753/MTP1069-6679160304
  29. 10.5465/amle.2008.31413868
  30. 10.5465/amle.2003.9901665
  31. 10.1080/14703297.2013.852480
  32. 10.2190/5NU3-FCP6-LU88-5282
  33. 10.1037/1089-2699.7.2.83
  34. 10.1177/1080569912460400
  35. 10.1177/1052562909358556
  36. 10.1002/j.2161-1920.2005.tb00893.x
  37. 10.1177/108056999806100211
  38. 10.1080/17405904.2013.813777
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →