Abstract

The ability to copy in relevant stakeholders has rendered the business email a useful tool for managing interpersonal relations and operational matters. However, CCing in business email has remained vastly underresearched in workplace discourse literature, a gap this article seeks to address. We explore the functions of CCing in workplace emails and the way formality is negotiated by writers in one organization. We draw on the analysis of email chains and discourse-based interviews and show that employees strategically project professional achievements and assume and deny responsibility for company decisions as they shift between the sender/receiver positions in the chain.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2019-03-01
DOI
10.1177/2329490618815700
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 7 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 63 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/01434632.2013.807273
  2. 10.1177/1750481311405589
  3. 10.1515/9781474403146
  4. 10.1093/applin/22.2.195
  5. 10.1017/CBO9780511486623
  6. 10.1017/S0047404510000400
  7. 10.1075/pbns.44
  8. 10.1207/s15327051hci2001&2_4
  9. 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00133.x
  10. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  11. 10.1016/j.esp.2008.01.001
  12. 10.1287/orsc.1100.0540
  13. 10.5465/amj.2016.4003
  14. 10.1017/CBO9780511487002
  15. 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  16. 10.4324/9780203451670_chapter_1
  17. 10.1207/s15327051hci2001&2_2
  18. 10.1016/j.esp.2012.03.001
  19. 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00051-3
  20. 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi066
  21. 10.1017/CBO9780511663673
  22. 10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00030-1
  23. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.005
  24. 10.4000/asp.3094
  25. 10.1016/j.esp.2013.11.002
  26. 10.4018/978-1-4666-4426-7.ch015
  27. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017
  28. 10.1002/smj.4250171110
  29. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.02.002
  30. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.002
  31. 10.1177/1461445611400673
  32. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.013
  33. 10.1177/1470595812452638
  34. 10.1080/00208825.2001.11656821
  35. 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.037
  36. 10.1177/108056990606900215
  37. 10.1016/j.esp.2009.06.004
  38. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.005
  39. 10.1515/TEXT.2006.004
  40. 10.1016/S0263-2373(97)00070-4
  41. 10.1515/multi-2014-0006
  42. 10.1515/lifijsal-2015-0009
  43. 10.1287/orsc.5.4.502
  44. 10.1080/00335638409383686
  45. 10.2307/2393771
  46. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.075
  47. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1990.tb00760.x
  48. 10.1515/9783110208375
  49. 10.1177/002194368802500403
  50. 10.1111/jcc4.12063
  51. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00314.x
  52. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.024
  53. 10.1016/0378-2166(95)00047-X
  54. 10.5040/9781350934085
  55. 10.1080/07256860305788
  56. 10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492
  57. 10.1007/s10796-009-9175-y
  58. 10.1177/0021943610377315
  59. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00333.x
  60. 10.1016/j.esp.2014.03.001
  61. 10.1016/j.esp.2015.11.001
  62. 10.1016/j.esp.2012.09.002
  63. 10.5465/amr.1992.4279545
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →