Mythologizing Change

Abstract

This article explores how rhetorical myth can be used as a tool for persuading employees to accept change and to maintain consensus during the process. It defines rhetorical myth using three concepts: chronographia (a rhetorical interpretation of history), epideictic prediction (defining a present action by assigning praise and blame to both past and future), and communal markers (using Burkean identification and rhetorically defined boundary objects to define a community). The article reports on a 3-year ethnographic study that documents the development of a rhetorical myth at Iowa State University’s Printing Services department as it underwent changes to its central software system.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2014-12-01
DOI
10.1177/2329490614543136
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/2393432
  2. 10.2307/256618
  3. 10.1108/09534819610128760
  4. 10.1525/9780520353237
  5. 10.5465/amj.2006.23478255
  6. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.07.004
  7. 10.1002/smj.4250120604
  8. 10.2307/256350
  9. 10.4135/9781452233222
  10. 10.1080/10510979109368343
  11. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00549.x
  12. 10.1177/089124102237821
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →