Avery Edenfield

3 articles

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Edenfield

Avery Edenfield's work travels primarily in Technical Communication (100% of indexed citations) · 3 indexed citations.

By cluster

  • Technical Communication — 3

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Queer Potential in Professional Communication: “Queer Use” & Terms of Service
    doi:10.1080/10572252.2025.2531972
  2. Unlikely allies in preventing sexual misconduct: Student led prevention efforts in a technical communication classroom: experience report
    Abstract

    Students' participation in relevant service learning can have a unique impact on their institution of higher education, if provided the opportunity. This article explores student-designed sexual misconduct prevention efforts taking place in an undergraduate project management course at one institution of higher education. We found that involving students in particular kinds of campus communication design and implementation simultaneously improved those efforts and offered students the opportunity to participate in impactful civic projects. In our article, we first examine the most common approach to sexual misconduct prevention, while considering its limitations. We then introduce a nontraditional collaboration---technical communication student involvement within prevention work---which resulted in new efforts. Finally, we illustrate how instructors can integrate similar collaborations.

    doi:10.1145/3487213.3487214
  3. From the book review editor
    Abstract

    The role of a book review is to serve the authors by bringing visibility to (and increasing the impact of) their work. For readers, it offers a snapshot so they can decide whether or not to invest in the book. For Communication Design Quarterly (CDQ) , book reviews should aim for an audience made of practitioners, teachers, and researchers. So, to resist the bifurcation between academic scholarship and practitioners, we recognize that many of our readers' concerns are shared. Books that are selected for review should be useful for scholars and practitioners alike. Similarly, reviews should aim to address shared concerns.

    doi:10.1145/3321388.3321394