Douglas Hesse

9 articles
  1. Journals in Composition Studies, Thirty-Five Years After
    doi:10.58680/ce201930085
  2. The Place of Creative Writing in Composition Studies
    Abstract

    For different reasons, composition studies and creative writing have resisted one another. Despite a historically thin discourse about creative writing within College Compositionand Communication, the relationship now merits attention. The two fields’ common interest should link them in a richer, more coherent view of writing for each other, forstudents, and for policymakers. As digital tools and media expand the nature and circulation of texts, composition studies should pay more attention to craft and to composingtexts not created in response to rhetorical situations or for scholars.

    doi:10.58680/ccc201011658
  3. SYMPOSIUM: The Scholar-Teacher-WPA: Stories from the Field
    Abstract

    These essays are based on a session called “Stories from the Field” at the 2004 meetings of the Conference on College Composition and Communication.

    doi:10.58680/ccc20054004
  4. The Place of Creative Nonfiction
    Abstract

    Discusses the topic of creative nonfiction and how it is addressed throughout this special issue. Suggests that how creative nonfiction is placed does have implications for literature and writing, both creative and non.

    doi:10.58680/ce20031285
  5. Symposium on peer reviewing in scholarly journals
    Abstract

    The idea for this symposium began when Sheryl Fontaine and Susan Hunter told Rick Gebhardt about two studies they had made of manuscript reviewing practices in composition studies--one surveying experiences and perceptions of authors and one dealing with journal referees. The subject of peer reviewing seemed an important one for a field working, as ours is, to definie its scholarly identity. Rick sensed that his efforts to bring blind refereeing to composition's oldest journal might prove useful in exploring the subject and, for addtional views, he contacted several of CCC's consulting readers. Carol Berkenkotter, who had been studying peer reviewing in the sciences, agreed to attempt a brief theoretical perspective. Phillip Arrington decided to explore the subject personally, from his experiences both as author and referee. And Doug Hesse chose to use personal experience, chaos theory, and MLA panels to discuss referees' reports as scholarship.

    doi:10.1080/07350199509359186
  6. Teachers as Students, Reflecting Resistance
    Abstract

    Preview this article: Teachers as Students, Reflecting Resistance, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ccc/44/2/collegecompositioncommunication8836-1.gif

    doi:10.58680/ccc19938836
  7. Analysis, file sharing, and freestanding computers: An “exigential” sequence
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(05)80020-9
  8. Expressive Discourse
    doi:10.2307/357550
  9. Style as Argument: Contemporary American Nonfiction
    doi:10.2307/358038