George F. Hayhoe

8 articles
Mercer University ORCID: 0000-0002-6855-5905

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Hayhoe

George F. Hayhoe's work travels primarily in Technical Communication (100% of indexed citations) · 2 indexed citations.

By cluster

  • Technical Communication — 2

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Thank You!
    doi:10.1109/tpc.2025.3622699
  2. An Editor's Thanks
    doi:10.1109/tpc.2025.3541973
  3. An Editor's Thanks
    Abstract

    The concept of peer review of manuscripts goes back to the founding of the first technical journal, the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, in London in 1665. That journal published papers shared at meetings and served as a permanent record of those contributions to knowledge. Peer review in those days was essentially the acceptance of a person's credentials for election to the Society. Since that time, and especially during the past 80 years, peer review has evolved into the process of double-anonymous vetting of manuscripts by expert reviewers that we take for granted today for most technical and professional journals.

    doi:10.1109/tpc.2024.3358195
  4. An Editor's Thanks
    doi:10.1109/tpc.2023.3242211
  5. An Editor's Thanks
    Abstract

    The publication offers a note of thanks and lists its reviewers.

    doi:10.1109/tpc.2022.3149365
  6. An Editor's Thanks for Reviewer Excellence
    Abstract

    Presents a listing of reviewers who contributed to this publication in 2020.

    doi:10.1109/tpc.2021.3058055
  7. A New Editor, The Same Transactions
    Abstract

    Presents information on the new Editor for this issue of the publication.

    doi:10.1109/tpc.2016.2566258
  8. Telling the future of information design
    Abstract

    Ask 10 technical communicators to define information design, and you're likely to get as many very different answers (Redish, 2000). Despite the variety, however, I think that most definitions of information design correspond more or less to one of the following approaches.

    doi:10.1145/2448917.2448922