James Sledd

32 articles
  1. On Buying in and Selling out: A Note for Bosses Old and New
    doi:10.2307/359066
  2. Responses to “New Faculty for a New University” and to “Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss”
    Abstract

    Preview this article: Responses to "New Faculty for a New University" and to "Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss", Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ccc/53/1/collegecompositionandcommunication1446-1.gif

    doi:10.58680/ccc20011446
  3. Comments &amp; Response: A Comment on “Freshman Composition as a Middleclass Enterprise”
    Abstract

    Preview this article: Comments & Response: A Comment on "Freshman Composition as a Middleclass Enterprise", Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/59/6/collegeenglish3650-1.gif

    doi:10.58680/ce19973650
  4. A Comment on "Freshman Composition as a Middle-Class Enterprise"
    doi:10.2307/378292
  5. Critical Pedagogy and Composition Scholarship
    doi:10.2307/358677
  6. Comment and Response
    Abstract

    Preview this article: Comment and Response, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/53/6/collegeenglish9559-1.gif

    doi:10.58680/ce19919559
  7. Two Comments on "Beyond Anti-Foundationalism to Rhetorical Authority: Problems Defining 'Cultural Literacy' "
    Abstract

    Andrew Sledd, James Sledd, Wayne Crawford, Two Comments on "Beyond Anti-Foundationalism to Rhetorical Authority: Problems Defining 'Cultural Literacy' ", College English, Vol. 53, No. 6 (Oct., 1991), pp. 717-724

    doi:10.2307/377897
  8. Product in Process: From Ambiguities of Standard English to Issues That Divide Us
    Abstract

    In the United States today, the executives of the transnational corporations and their flunkies in the military-industrial-educational complex are working a technological revolution within a society as stratified in fact as it is egalitarian in theory. One obvious part of this military-industrial-educational strategy is a drive to maintain and extend corporate control of schooling and-more generally-corporate control of the accumulation, storage, and dissemination of knowledge. The rich and powerful (need one say it?) mean to profit at the expense of the poor and powerless while proclaiming their concern for the good of all. We who teach the use of English can expect no honored place in the corporate executives' envisioned world of computerized high technology. The language of their Institutional Voice already differs observably from the Standard English which some of us have known and all of us have claimed to teach. To be sure, we have our own creaky modulations of the Institutional Voice. They are prescribed by the style manuals of our professional societies-societies which by and large accept the social assumptions of the dominant and cultivate modes of expression calculated to set upwardly mobile professionals apart and to reduce

    doi:10.2307/377646
  9. Opinion: Product in Process: From Ambiguities of Standard English to Issues That Divide Us
    Abstract

    Preview this article: Opinion: Product in Process: From Ambiguities of Standard English to Issues That Divide Us, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/50/2/collegeenglish11418-1.gif

    doi:10.58680/ce198811418
  10. A Comment on "Social Construction, Language, and the Authority of Knowledge" and "A Polemical History of Freshman Composition in Our Time"
    Abstract

    James Sledd, Sally Reagan, Reginald D. Clarke, A Comment on "Social Construction, Language, and the Authority of Knowledge" and "A Polemical History of Freshman Composition in Our Time", College English, Vol. 49, No. 5 (Sep., 1987), pp. 585-593

    doi:10.2307/378058
  11. Comment and Response
    Abstract

    Preview this article: Comment and Response, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/49/5/collegeenglish11472-1.gif

    doi:10.58680/ce198711472
  12. James Sledd Responds
    doi:10.2307/377214
  13. Comment and Response
    doi:10.58680/ce198413333
  14. In Defense of the Students’ Right
    doi:10.58680/ce198313601
  15. In Defense of the Students' Right
    doi:10.2307/377176
  16. Language Differences and Literary Values: Divagations from a Theme
    doi:10.58680/ce197616622
  17. "Hang Your Clothes on a Hickory Limb": Comment for David Eskey
    doi:10.2307/374959
  18. Comment &amp; Response
    doi:10.58680/ce197516979
  19. Response to Walter Hickman
    doi:10.2307/375581
  20. Response to Dr. Crew and Dr. Guth
    doi:10.2307/375552
  21. Response to George R. Beissel
    doi:10.2307/375549
  22. Doublespeak: Dialectology in the Service of Big Brother
    doi:10.58680/ce197218360
  23. Old English Prosody: A Demurrer
    doi:10.2307/374142
  24. Soap for Burnel's Head
    doi:10.2307/372988
  25. Soap for Burnel’s Head
    doi:10.58680/ce196426900
  26. In Defense of History
    doi:10.58680/ce196327268
  27. Dictionaries and That Dictionary
    doi:10.2307/355022
  28. Book Reviews
    doi:10.2307/373797
  29. A Plea for Pluralism
    doi:10.2307/373932
  30. The California Experiment: An Essay in Disbelief
    doi:10.2307/373169
  31. Coordination (Faulty) and Subordination (Upside-Down)
    doi:10.2307/354246
  32. Coordination (Faulty) and Subordination (Upside-Down)1
    doi:10.58680/ccc195622619