Preview this article: Round Table: Teaching the Teaching Assistant, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/26/3/collegeenglish27089-1.gif

emphasis upon scholarly rather than pedagogical training for Ph.D. candidates, but a few enlightened souls have lately begun to sound clear and public warnings of the problem that exists. Henry WV. Sams, for example, has argued that we must awaken our fledgling colleagues to the fact that their responsibilities go somewhat further than establishing themselves as scholars, critics, and overpowering young polymaths (The Audiences of English, CE, Feb. 1964). Recognizing the problem, however, is only the first step; an analysis of its conditions must follow, from which criticism and suggestions for change may proceed.

John Loftis, J. W. Robinson, Edward Partridge, Jay L. Halio, R. E. K., R. W. Dent, Robert Etheridge Moore, Louis Crompton, Richard M. Eastman, John J. Enck, R. M. Lumiansky, Scott Elledge, C. E. Pulos, B. D. S., John Unterecker, Allen B. Brown, James T. Nardin, Edward P. J. Corbett, William Coyle, Archibald A. Hill, Book Reviews, College English, Vol. 23, No. 7 (Apr., 1962), pp. 595-608

Robert R. Meyers, Jay L. Halio, Robert M. Boltwood, Norman Friedman, Warren G. French, Howard A. Burton, Jack C. Gray, Elizabeth B. Orlosky, Robert W. Hively, Marion Montgomery, Lawrence W. Hyman, Publish: Perish or Flourish?, College English, Vol. 23, No. 4 (Jan., 1962), pp. 316-319

Preview this article: Rebuttal: Publish: Perish or Flourish?, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/23/4/collegeenglish27997-1.gif