Abstract
emphasis upon scholarly rather than pedagogical training for Ph.D. candidates, but a few enlightened souls have lately begun to sound clear and public warnings of the problem that exists. Henry WV. Sams, for example, has argued that we must awaken our fledgling colleagues to the fact that their responsibilities go somewhat further than establishing themselves as scholars, critics, and overpowering young polymaths (The Audiences of English, CE, Feb. 1964). Recognizing the problem, however, is only the first step; an analysis of its conditions must follow, from which criticism and suggestions for change may proceed.
- Journal
- College English
- Published
- 1964-12-01
- DOI
- 10.2307/373596
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Computers and Composition Jun 2026“Article laundry” or “tutor in pocket?”: Multilingual writers’ generative AI-assisted writing in professional settings ↗Qianqian Zhang-Wu
-
Argumentation Mar 2026Between Rationality and Self-protection: Student-Constructed Arguments on Fast Food Consumption and Antibiotic Overuse as Public Health Issues in Biology Education ↗Eliza Rybska; Michał Klichowski; Costas P. Constantinou; Barbara Jankowiak
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Mar 2026Vincent Russell; Grace Cheshire; Gabriel Wisnewski-Parks
-
Literacy in Composition Studies Feb 2026Jason Hockaday
-
Prompt: A Journal of Academic Writing Assignments Jan 2026A Murder Most Technical: Gamification, AI, and Rhetorical Genre Studies in the Technical Writing Classroom ↗Justin Cook