Jennifer L. Weston

2 articles
Arizona State University

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Weston

Jennifer L. Weston's work travels primarily in Composition & Writing Studies (52% of indexed citations) · 25 total indexed citations from 4 clusters.

By cluster

  • Composition & Writing Studies — 13
  • Rhetoric — 10
  • Digital & Multimodal — 1
  • Technical Communication — 1

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. The Writing Pal Intelligent Tutoring System: Usability Testing and Development
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2014.09.002
  2. The Development of Writing Proficiency as a Function of Grade Level: A Linguistic Analysis
    Abstract

    In this study, a corpus of essays stratified by level (9th grade, 11th grade, and college freshman) are analyzed computationally to discriminate differences between the linguistic features produced in essays by adolescents and young adults. The automated tool Coh-Metrix is used to examine to what degree essays written at various grade levels can be distinguished from one another using a number of linguistic features related to lexical sophistication (i.e., word frequency, word concreteness), syntactic complexity (i.e., the number of modifiers per noun phrase), and cohesion (i.e., word overlap, incidence of connectives). The analysis demonstrates that high school and college writers develop linguistic strategies as a function of grade level. Primarily, these writers produce more sophisticated words and more complex sentence structure as grade level increases. In contrast, these writers produce fewer cohesive features in text as a function of grade level. This analysis supports the notion that linguistic development occurs in the later stages of writing development and that this development is primarily related to producing texts that are less cohesive and more elaborate.

    doi:10.1177/0741088311410188