Computers and Composition Dec 2014

The Writing Pal Intelligent Tutoring System: Usability Testing and Development

Rod D. Roscoe Arizona State University ; Laura K. Allen Arizona State University ; Jennifer L. Weston Arizona State University ; Scott A. Crossley Georgia State University ; Danielle S. McNamara Arizona State University
Journal
Computers and Composition
Published
2014-12-01
DOI
10.1016/j.compcom.2014.09.002
Open Access
Closed
Topics
writing centers technical communication multilingual writers

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Huang et al. (2021)
    Using automated feedback to develop writing proficiency
    Computers and Composition

Cites in this index (3)

  1. McNamara et al. (2010)
    Linguistic Features of Writing Quality
    Written Communication
  2. Wohlpart et al. (2008)
    The Reliability of Computer Software to Score Essays: Innovations in a Humaniti…
    Computers and Composition
  3. Hilgers (1980)
    Training College Composition Students in the Use of Freewriting and Problem-Sol…
    Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 27 works outside this index ↓
  1. Barab (2005)
    Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns
    Educational Technology Research and Development  ↗
  2. Clauser (2002)
    Validity issues for computer-based tests scored with computer-automated scoring systems
    Applied Measurement in Education  ↗
  3. Crossley (2011)
    Understanding expert ratings of essay quality: Coh-Metrix analyses of first and second la…
    International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning  ↗
  4. de la Paz (2002)
    Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle scho…
    Journal of Educational Psychology  ↗
  5. Flower (1981)
    A cognitive process theory of writing
    College Composition and Communication  ↗
  6. Graesser (2011)
    Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension
    Topics in Cognitive Science  ↗
  7. Graham (2007)
    A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students
    Journal of Educational Psychology  ↗
  8. Hearst (2002)
    The debate on automated essay scoring
    Intelligent Systems and their Applications, IEEE  ↗
  9. Henry (1999)
    Raising awareness of the generic structure and linguistic features of essay introductions
    Language Awareness  ↗
  10. Hillocks (1984)
    What works in teaching composition: a meta-analysis of experimental treatment studies
    American Journal of Education  ↗
  11. Holzinger (2005)
    Usability engineering methods for software developers
    Communications of the ACM  ↗
  12. Huot (1996)
    Toward a new theory of writing assessment
    College Composition and Communication  ↗
  13. Hyland (1990)
    A genre description of the argumentative essay
    RELC Journal  ↗
  14. Kellogg (2010)
    Does automated feedback help students learn to write?
    Journal of Educational Computing Research  ↗
  15. Landauer (2003)
    Automatic essay assessment
    Assessment in Education  ↗
  16. McGarrell (2007)
    Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback
    ELT Journal  ↗
  17. McNamara (2005)
    Multimedia and hypermedia solutions for prompting metacognitive engagement, coherence, an…
    Journal of Educational Computer Research  ↗
  18. O’Neil (2005)
    Classification of learning outcomes: Evidence from the computer games literature
    Curriculum Journal  ↗
  19. Orbach (1979)
    Simulation games and motivation for learning: A theoretical framework
    Simulation and Games  ↗
  20. Powers (2002)
    Stumping e-rater: challenging the validity of automated essay scoring
    Computers in Human Behavior  ↗
  21. Proctor (2007)
    A multimethod approach to examining usability of Web privacy policies and user agents for…
    Behavior Research Methods  ↗
  22. Roscoe (2013)
    Developing pedagogically-guided algorithms for intelligent writing feedback
    International Journal of Learning Technology  ↗
  23. Scheiter (2007)
    Learner control in hypermedia environments
    Educational Psychology Review  ↗
  24. Shute (2008)
    Focus on formative feedback
    Review of Educational Research  ↗
  25. Sommers (1982)
    Responding to student writing
    College Composition and Communication  ↗
  26. Warschauer (2006)
    Automated writing evaluation: defining the classroom research agenda
    Language Teaching Research  ↗
  27. Wixon (2003)
    Evaluating usability methods: why the current literature fails the practitioner
    Interactions  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 80 View in citation network →

Related Articles

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication Oct 2007
    Comments on Lab Reports by Mechanical Engineering Teaching Assistants ↗
    Summer Smith Taylor
    writing centers assessment graduate education multimodality technical communication scientific writing multilingual writers
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Apr 2003
    Drawing on Technical Writing Scholarship for the Teaching of Writing to Advanced Esl Students—A Writing Tutorial ↗
    Dorota Zielinska
    writing centers quantitative research technical communication multilingual writers
  3. College Composition and Communication Feb 1992
    Reviews ↗
    writing centers multimodality technical communication professional writing multilingual writers creative writing
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Apr 2026
    What Video Games Can Tell Us About Interactive Technical Communication ↗
    Emily Kuzneski Johnson
    multimodality technical communication multilingual writers
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Apr 2026
    “Is This Ethical?” New Data on the Ethical Principles and Practices of Document Design ↗
    Leslie Seawright; Amy Hodges; Timothy Ponce
    multimodality technical communication disability studies multilingual writers