In this article, an analysis and critique of one small but pedagogically significant component of classroom discourse (instructors’ use of long-familiar questioning routines in whole-group classroom discussion) is used to support the larger argument that analysis of classroom discourse at the college level offers many valuable ways to reflect on, and transform, our teaching.

The preceding two essays focus on the ongoing challenge to engage students in meaningful conversation with the course content, their reading, their instructor, and one another. The authors, Maureen Neal and Ed Jones, have read each other’s essays and provided the following brief responses. This cross talk between the writers is an attempt to make explicit the more subtle cross talk between the essays experienced by those who read them one after the other.