Ned O'Gorman

3 articles
  1. A Review of: “<i>The Viability of the Rhetorical Tradition</i>, by Richard Graff, Arthur E. Walzer, and Janet M. Atwill, eds.”
    Abstract

    Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1. This emphasis on pedagogy is consistent with the consensus formed at the 2003 Alliance of Rhetoric Societies Conference held in Evanston, Illinois, summed up in Jeffrey Walker's statement there, “What makes rhetoric rhetoric is its teaching tradition.” For more on this position, see the essays in the Summer 2004 (volume 34, issue 3) issue of Rhetoric Society Quarterly, especially Gerard A. Hauser's Hauser , Gerard A. “Teaching Rhetoric: Or Why Rhetoric Isn't Just Another Kind of Philosophy or Literary Criticism.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 34 ( 2004 ): 39 – 53 . [CSA] [Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar] “Teaching Rhetoric: Or Why Rhetoric Isn't Just Another Kind of Philosophy or Literary Criticism.”

    doi:10.1080/02773940500403710
  2. Aristotle’s <i>Phantasia</i> in the <i>Rhetoric</i> : <i>Lexis</i> , Appearance, and the Epideictic Function of Discourse
    Abstract

    Research Article| January 01 2005 Aristotle’s Phantasia in the Rhetoric: Lexis, Appearance, and the Epideictic Function of Discourse Ned O'Gorman Ned O'Gorman Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2005) 38 (1): 16–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/40238199 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Ned O'Gorman; Aristotle’s Phantasia in the Rhetoric: Lexis, Appearance, and the Epideictic Function of Discourse. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2005; 38 (1): 16–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/40238199 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2004 The Pennsylvania State University2004The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

    doi:10.2307/40238199
  3. Longinus's sublime rhetoric, or how rhetoric game into its own
    Abstract

    Abstract This essay argues that Peri Hypsous (On Height or On the Sublime, traditionally attributed to "Longinus") marks an important moment in the history of rhetoric, as rhetoric is presented therein as an autonomous, sublime object. Through notions of hypsos (height) and physis (nature), and an amalgamation of Ciceronian/lsocratean arid Gorgianic notions of rhetoric, "Longinus" frees rhetoric from the project of legitimation. He makes it a marvel that needs no justification—rhetoric "comes into its own." Even as I account for the emergence of this conception of rhetoric in Peri Hypsous, I question its helpfulness for rhetorical studies.

    doi:10.1080/02773940409391282