Xiaofei Lu

7 articles
Pennsylvania State University ORCID: 0000-0003-2365-2581

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Lu

Xiaofei Lu's work travels primarily in Composition & Writing Studies (100% of indexed citations) · 11 indexed citations.

By cluster

  • Composition & Writing Studies — 11

Top citing journals

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Comparing GPT-based approaches in automated writing evaluation
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100961
  2. Using ChatGPT to facilitate vocabulary learning in continuation writing assessment tasks
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100952
  3. Noun phrase complexity and second language Chinese proficiency: An analysis of narratives by Korean learners of Chinese
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100810
  4. The design and cognitive validity verification of reading-to-write tasks in L2 Chinese writing assessment
    Abstract

    Reading-to-write (RTW) tasks have been commonly employed in second language (L2) English academic writing pedagogy, and many studies have investigated the validity and reliability of RTW tasks in L2 English writing assessment. Meanwhile, few studies have examined the cognitive validity of RTW tasks, and the design and validation of such tasks in L2 Chinese academic writing assessment remain underexplored. This study develops a Chinese RTW task following a set of design criteria and procedures and evaluates its cognitive validity as an instrument of L2 Chinese academic writing assessment. The RTW task was administered to 15 undergraduate and 15 postgraduate L2 Chinese learners in an eye-tracking laboratory. Analyses of the task features and the eye-tracking and stimulated recall interview data suggested that the RTW task largely aligned with the characteristics of authentic tasks in real L2 Chinese academic writing contexts and elicited a representative range of cognitive processes in existing models of RTW cognitive processes. Many of these processes manifested in different ways between the two groups of participants at different L2 Chinese proficiency levels. Our findings have useful implications for understanding the cognitive validity of the RTW task in L2 Chinese writing assessment.

    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100699
  5. The predictive powers of fine-grained syntactic complexity indices for letter writing proficiency and their relationship to pragmatic appropriateness
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100707
  6. Assessing pragmatic performance in advanced L2 academic writing through the lens of local grammars: A case study of ‘exemplification’
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100668
  7. Revisiting the predictive power of traditional vs. fine-grained syntactic complexity indices for L2 writing quality: The case of two genres
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100597