Argumentation

1382 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

December 1995

  1. Book reviews
    doi:10.1007/bf00744762
  2. Editor's introduction
    doi:10.1007/bf00744756
  3. Critical Legal Studies and argumentation theory
    doi:10.1007/bf00744752
  4. Passing through the Needle's eye: Can a feminist teach logic?
    doi:10.1007/bf00744759
  5. Appeal to pity: A case study of theargumentum ad misericordiam
    doi:10.1007/bf00744757
  6. Coalescent argumentation
    doi:10.1007/bf00744761

November 1995

  1. Ethical Egoism, Utilitarianism and the fallacy of pragmatic inconsistency
    doi:10.1007/bf00737780
  2. Forthcoming issue
    doi:10.1007/bf00737787
  3. Book reviews
    doi:10.1007/bf00737785
  4. Preface
    doi:10.1007/bf00737773
  5. A fallacy of aristotle's about ends
    doi:10.1007/bf00737774
  6. Are ?is? to ?ought? deductions fallacious? on a Humean formal argument
    doi:10.1007/bf00737776
  7. Fallacies in two objections to Kant's first defense of the duty of beneficence in the Grundlegung
    doi:10.1007/bf00737783
  8. Fallacies and moral dilemmas
    doi:10.1007/bf00737782
  9. A fallacious argument against moral absolutes
    doi:10.1007/bf00737781
  10. Scientism, deconstruction, and nihilism
    doi:10.1007/bf00737778
  11. And so indeed are perfect cheat
    doi:10.1007/bf00737784
  12. The utilitarian fallacy
    doi:10.1007/bf00737775
  13. Is it always fallacious to derive values from facts?
    doi:10.1007/bf00737777
  14. Announcement
    doi:10.1007/bf00737786
  15. Pluralism, scientific knowledge, and the fallacy of overriding values
    doi:10.1007/bf00737779

July 1995

  1. Expert witnesses in legal argumentation
    doi:10.1007/bf00733154
  2. La Modernit� Esth�tique et la Querelle du Go�t
    doi:10.1007/bf00733151
  3. La Nouvelle Rh�torique devant la tradition rationaliste Occidentale
    doi:10.1007/bf00733155
  4. Book reviews
    doi:10.1007/bf00733156
  5. ?Beautiful communication?: Schiller, Wittgenstein and the rhetoric of the Aesthetic
    doi:10.1007/bf00733153
  6. Sur Quelques Paradoxes de la Modernit� Esth�tique
    doi:10.1007/bf00733150
  7. Argumentation and interpretation in law
    doi:10.1007/bf00733152
  8. Editor's Introduction
    doi:10.1007/bf00733149

May 1995

  1. Analysing and evaluating problem-solving discussions
    doi:10.1007/bf00721965
  2. Bibliography argumentation studies 1993
    doi:10.1007/bf00721968
  3. The computational value of debate in defeasible reasoning
    doi:10.1007/bf00721964
  4. Book Reviews
    doi:10.1007/bf00721969
  5. Linked arguments and the validity requirement
    doi:10.1007/bf00721963
  6. Ad hominem arguments in practical argumentation
    doi:10.1007/bf00721966
  7. ?That's not fair!? argumentational integrity as an ethics of argumentative communication
    doi:10.1007/bf00721962
  8. Cultural attitudes: in contexts of argumentation and explanation
    doi:10.1007/bf00721967

February 1995

  1. Notes on contributors
    doi:10.1007/bf00733103
  2. Language, moral order and political praxis
    doi:10.1007/bf00733101
  3. Announcement
    doi:10.1007/bf00733113
  4. Arguing about the ethics of past actions: An analysis of a taped conversation about a taped conversation
    doi:10.1007/bf00733110
  5. On the continuing utility of argument in a postmodern world
    doi:10.1007/bf00733108
  6. Ecocentrism and argumentative competence: Roots of a postmodern argument theory from the brazilian deforestation debate
    doi:10.1007/bf00733109
  7. Postmodernism and the parody of argument
    doi:10.1007/bf00733105
  8. Argument practices
    doi:10.1007/bf00733107
  9. Power on the margins: A new place for intellectuals to be
    doi:10.1007/bf00733102
  10. Can we still stand by words? or: Why rhetoric needs A pragmatic turn
    doi:10.1007/bf00733100
  11. The given of achievement and the reluctance to assent: Argument and inquiry in the post-postmodern world
    doi:10.1007/bf00733106
  12. Announcement and call for proposals
    doi:10.1007/bf00733112
  13. Editors' introduction
    doi:10.1007/bf00733104