Preview this article: Review: Social Construtionism and Literacy Studies, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/57/8/collegeenglish9087-1.gif

Preview this article: Accumulating Literacy: Writing and Learning to Write in the Twentieth Century, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/57/6/collegeenglish9102-1.gif

Preview this article: Learning Literacies, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/57/6/collegeenglish9103-1.gif

Preview this article: Translating Self and Difference Through Literacy Narratives, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/56/5/collegeenglish9215-1.gif

Preview this article: Review: Language and Literacy at Home and at School, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/55/7/collegeenglish9277-1.gif

ere is seldom mentioned but universally known fact of our profession, bluntly stated: the vast majority of our undergraduate students do not love or appreciate literature as we do. Indeed, the value of studying literature, the rewards of reading, are not immediately apparent to surprisingly large number of students, despite vaguely conceived (and externally imposed) notion that reading serious literature is somehow essential to becoming a wellrounded person. So we shake our heads in dismay, share our war stories in faculty lounges, rejoice in our occasional successes, and generally bemoan these students' lack of interest, spotty education, and limited life experiences; the sorry state of basic literacy in recent years; the dismal and misguided teaching conducted in high schools; and, eventually, the anti-intellectual strain in American culture itself, exacerbated by television, Danielle Steel, and Stephen King. Embedded in all this are unstated inklings that our entire enterprise may be suspect or indefensibly elitist. And it was ever so. Gerald Graff's Professing Literature: An Institutional History is replete with accounts of MLA addresses from the turn of the century onwards which express concern over students' indifference to literary studies and to the latest professional trends in literary theory. Even the decades-long debates over scholarship vs. criticism chronicled by Graff on occasion find it necessary to deal, somewhat reluctantly, with pedagogy and classroom applications. Not often enough, it has always seemed to me. This and other sweeping generalizations that follow, along with some radical observations-and few suggestions-are intended to refocus attention on what I take to be the principal function of college literature teachers, their primary raison d'etre: teaching undergraduates.

Preview this article: Orality, Literacy, and Memory in Toni Morrison's Song of Solomon, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/55/1/collegeenglish9332-1.gif

Preview this article: Review: Politicizing Literacy, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/54/7/collegeenglish9359-1.gif

Preview this article: Reading Literacy Narratives, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/54/5/collegeenglish9374-1.gif

Andrew Sledd, James Sledd, Wayne Crawford, Two Comments on "Beyond Anti-Foundationalism to Rhetorical Authority: Problems Defining 'Cultural Literacy' ", College English, Vol. 53, No. 6 (Oct., 1991), pp. 717-724

Preview this article: Narratives of Socialization: Literacy in the Short Story, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/53/6/collegeenglish9557-1.gif

Preview this article: Review: Literacy and Teaching: In Search of a "Language of Possibility", Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/53/2/collegeenglish9597-1.gif

Preview this article: Review: On Literacy Anthologies and Adult Education: A Critical Perspective, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/52/8/collegeenglish9615-1.gif

Preview this article: Beyond Anti-Foundationalism to Rhetorical Authority: Problems Defining "Cultural Literacy", Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/52/6/collegeenglish9633-1.gif

Preview this article: Review: Rethinking Reading and Writing from the Perspective of Translation, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/52/6/collegeenglish9634-1.gif

Literacy instruction or the lack of it has a wide range of social consequencespolitical, economic, cultural. These consequences are most obvious when the members of some community are forbidden by law to learn to read-as, for example, blacks were in states of the antebellum South-in order to prevent them from raising their social standing and posing a political, economic, or cultural threat to the dominant community. More subtle but equally pervasive consequences stem from restrictions on advanced forms of literacy. In modern urbanindustrial society, less visible barriers to achieving advanced literacy also preserve the integrity and status of existing communities and limit access to coveted social roles. That process, however, like modern society itself, is much more complex than the crude legal bans on literacy common in agrarian societies.

Preview this article: Literacy and Genre: Towards a Pedagogy of Mediation, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/51/7/collegeenglish11269-1.gif

Preview this article: Essay: Readin' not Riotin': The Politics of Literacy, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/50/5/collegeenglish11382-1.gif

Preview this article: Review: A Few Words More about E. D. Hirsch and Cultural Literacy, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/50/3/collegeenglish11411-1.gif

Preview this article: Hell Is the Place We Don't Know We're In: The Control-Dictions of Cultural Literacy, Strong Reading, and Poetry, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/50/3/collegeenglish11408-1.gif

Preview this article: A Post-Freirean Model for Adult Literacy Education, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/50/2/collegeenglish11419-1.gif

Preview this article: Arguing about Literacy, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/50/2/collegeenglish11415-1.gif

Most Freshman English programs conceive of themselves as providing some form of introduction to university level discourse. The expectation is that students will leave English I (or whatever its designation) with the requisite reading and writing skills to enter a new discourse community, the world of the academy. Just what that means, however, is invariably in contention. Even within our own discipline, the acts of reading and writing have become the subject of much controversy. A recent review in College English gives some indication of one of the current divisions within the profession about exactly what we teach people when we teach them to read: Despite the recent wrangle and heated debates among the various camps of literary criticism, there are quite a few of us-most,

The theory that reading is composing-an open-ended, investigative, and active process-is hardly new. Over the past few years, writing teachers have turned their attention to reading and extended the useful term to describe not only the recursive movement among the pre-writing, drafting, and revising stages of writing, but also the construction of meaning through reading. The theories they have drawn on range from the work of reading researchers like Harry Singer, Frank Smith, and Charles Cooper and Anthony Petrosky to critical theorists like Wolfgang Iser, Louise Rosenblatt and Roland Barthes.' While it is difficult to generalize about such wide-ranging work, a quick review of the literature of constructive reading shows agreement on one point: the power of conventions, or schemata, to shape our understanding of a text. But the language for naming this phenomenon is divergent. Reading researchers describe the process of composing meaning in apparently neutral terms-comprehending, reading for meaning, learning from text-and some separate a literal from an interpretive level of reading,2 using Benjamin Bloom's taxonomy (89-90), influential since the 1950s. Critical theorists, on the other hand, show that all composed meanings are interpretations; this is the view we want to illustrate as we describe, theoretically and practically, a sequence of writing assignments used to encourage interpretation in our introductory composition classes. In our view, the same questions asked by critical theory-what is reading, what is the status of a text, how do we clarify approaches to interpretation-are questions to be asked by composition teachers, whose job is to teach students how to compose readings of texts, literary and non-literary, written and nonwritten. With this aim in mind, we agreed to define interpretation as a process of both reading and writing. We discarded conventional injunctions to look at the words, as if simply gazing at words on the page would force them into meaning. We insisted instead that good readers must understand the assumptions that determine what they see, that good writers do not wait for meaning to take

Preview this article: Literacy, Technology, and Monopoly Capital, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/47/7/collegeenglish13246-1.gif

Preview this article: Literacy in the Department of English, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/47/5/collegeenglish13266-1.gif