Introduction| October 01 2013 Editors’ Introduction: What Is College For? Jennifer L. Holberg; Jennifer L. Holberg Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Marcy Taylor Marcy Taylor Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Pedagogy (2013) 13 (3): 411–414. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-2266387 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Jennifer L. Holberg, Marcy Taylor; Editors’ Introduction: What Is College For?. Pedagogy 1 October 2013; 13 (3): 411–414. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-2266387 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter Books & JournalsAll JournalsPedagogy Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 by Duke University Press2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Other| October 01 2013 Contributors Pedagogy (2013) 13 (3): 563–565. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-2377700 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Contributors. Pedagogy 1 October 2013; 13 (3): 563–565. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-2377700 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsPedagogy Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 by Duke University Press2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal Issue Section: Contributors You do not currently have access to this content.

Public writing spaces, such as blogs and social media sites, are expanding quickly with new websites, web applications, and other interfaces constantly available to users. As these digital composing spaces continue to expand, it is important that writers are capable of operating within them, yet many composition students lack the rhetorical awareness to present effective arguments in multimodal digital interfaces. To address this issue, the author designed a project to introduce students to public writing while reflecting on the implications of the permanence of their writing, the searchability of these public spaces, and their responsibility as writers. This project began by asking students to reflect on their own online personae, be it through Facebook profiles, personal blogs, or online class forums. Utilizing websites like Yelp and YouTube offered students the opportunity to see how others present themselves online and the effectiveness of composers in these digital spaces. Taught in an online course format, this project demonstrates how writing can live outside of the traditional classroom space and contribute to the students’ community. For the writing teacher, it creates the occasion to delve into students’ understandings of ethics in online writing while illustrating the rhetorical components necessitated by composing in digital media.

Teaching problem: Students' written assignments show that they tend to list ideas rather than provide evidence-based arguments. This might be because they do not have a framework to base their arguments on. Research question: Does the communication model framework help students to write evidence-based arguments when evaluating the communicative effectiveness in corporate blogs? Situating the case: The ability to engage in argument from evidence is one of the Next Generation Science Standards for scientific and engineering practices. Thus, it is important for engineering students to know how to present evidence-based arguments. The communication model framework was introduced to provide students with a framework to base their arguments on. This framework builds on the genre-based and academic literacies approaches to teaching writing. More companies are now using corporate blogs (an open, participatory, and globally networked social media tool) to engage stakeholders directly across multiple contexts. The framework is useful in analyzing evolving genres like corporate blogs because it is not only structured but also flexible. About the case: This teaching case describes the use of the communication model framework as the basis for students' arguments. The framework was used in a general writing course for engineering students. Working in groups, the students used the framework for their oral practice critique and their critique assignment on a given piece of academic writing or corporate blog. They also had to write a reflection paper individually at the end of the course. Results: Overall, the mixed groups and international students groups made a stronger attempt to apply the framework compared to the Singaporean student groups. The students' educational backgrounds, the group dynamics within the group, and the nature of the discussions affected the level of adoption of the framework in their writing. Conclusions: This teaching case reflects the value of mixed group, face-to-face discussions, and personal reflection in teaching students evidence-based writing, and calls for more research on flexible frameworks as genres evolve.

Book Review| September 01 2013 A Presidency Upstaged: The Public Leadership of George H. W. Bush A Presidency Upstaged: The Public Leadership of George H. W. Bush. By Lori Cox Han. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2011; pp. xi + 242. $40.00 cloth. Sara A. Mehltretter Drury Sara A. Mehltretter Drury Wabash College Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (3): 617–620. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.3.0617 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Sara A. Mehltretter Drury; A Presidency Upstaged: The Public Leadership of George H. W. Bush. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 September 2013; 16 (3): 617–620. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.3.0617 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| September 01 2013 Reclaiming the Rural: Essays on Literacy, Rhetoric, and Pedagogy Reclaiming the Rural: Essays on Literacy, Rhetoric, and Pedagogy. Edited by Kim Donehower, Charlotte Hogg, and Eileen E. Schell. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2012; pp. vii + 262. $35.00 paper. Jeff Motter Jeff Motter Appalachian State University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (3): 613–617. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.3.0613 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Jeff Motter; Reclaiming the Rural: Essays on Literacy, Rhetoric, and Pedagogy. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 September 2013; 16 (3): 613–617. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.3.0613 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| September 01 2013 Commonwealth Commonwealth. By Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009; pp. v + 434. $38.50 cloth; $21.95 paper. Isaac Clarke Holyoak Isaac Clarke Holyoak Texas A&M University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (3): 607–610. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.3.0607 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Isaac Clarke Holyoak; Commonwealth. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 September 2013; 16 (3): 607–610. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.3.0607 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| September 01 2013 Reading Embodied Citizenship: Disability, Narrative, and the Body Politic Reading Embodied Citizenship: Disability, Narrative, and the Body Politic. By Emily Russell. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2011; pp. vii + 243. $44.95 cloth; $28.95 paper. Rachel D. Davidson Rachel D. Davidson University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (3): 610–613. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.3.0610 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Rachel D. Davidson; Reading Embodied Citizenship: Disability, Narrative, and the Body Politic. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 September 2013; 16 (3): 610–613. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.3.0610 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| September 01 2013 No Citizen Left Behind No Citizen Left Behind. By Meira Levinson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012; pp. 388. $29.95 cloth. Brian Scott Amsden Brian Scott Amsden Indiana University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (3): 603–607. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.3.0603 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Brian Scott Amsden; No Citizen Left Behind. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 September 2013; 16 (3): 603–607. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.3.0603 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| September 01 2013 Prisoners of Conscience: Moral Vernaculars of Political Agency Prisoners of Conscience: Moral Vernaculars of Political Agency. By Gerard A. Hauser. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2012; pp. xvii + 283. $49.95 cloth. Michael Warren Tumolo Michael Warren Tumolo Duquesne University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (3): 591–594. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.3.0591 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Michael Warren Tumolo; Prisoners of Conscience: Moral Vernaculars of Political Agency. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 September 2013; 16 (3): 591–594. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.3.0591 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| September 01 2013 We Are the Union: Democratic Unionism and Dissent at Boeing We Are the Union: Democratic Unionism and Dissent at Boeing. By Dana L. Cloud. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2011; pp. xvi + 236. $55.00 cloth. Karma R. Chávez Karma R. Chávez University of Wisconsin, Madison Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (3): 597–600. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.3.0597 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Karma R. Chávez; We Are the Union: Democratic Unionism and Dissent at Boeing. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 September 2013; 16 (3): 597–600. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.3.0597 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| September 01 2013 Compelling Confessions: The Politics of Personal Disclosure Compelling Confessions: The Politics of Personal Disclosure. Edited by Suzanne Diamond. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2011; pp. 230. $58.50 cloth. Mary Jo Wiatrak-Uhlenkott Mary Jo Wiatrak-Uhlenkott University of Minnesota Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (3): 600–603. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.3.0600 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Mary Jo Wiatrak-Uhlenkott; Compelling Confessions: The Politics of Personal Disclosure. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 September 2013; 16 (3): 600–603. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.3.0600 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| August 01 2013 Review: Catherine Gordon-Seifert, Music and the Language of Love: Seventeenth-Century French Airs by Catherine Gordon-Seifert Catherine Gordon-Seifert, Music and the Language of Love: Seventeenth-Century French Airs. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2011, xiii, 390pp.: black and white illustrations, tables, musical exx. ISBN 978-0-253-35461-7. $44.95 Rhetorica (2013) 31 (3): 334–337. https://doi.org/10.1525/RH.2013.31.3.334 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Review: Catherine Gordon-Seifert, Music and the Language of Love: Seventeenth-Century French Airs by Catherine Gordon-Seifert. Rhetorica 1 August 2013; 31 (3): 334–337. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/RH.2013.31.3.334 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2013 by The International Society for the History of Rhetoric. All rights reserved.2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| August 01 2013 Review: Eric MacPhail, The Sophistic Renaissance by Eric MacPhail Eric MacPhail, The Sophistic Renaissance (Travaux d'Humanisme et Renaissance 485), Geneva: Droz, 2011, 155 pp. ISBN: 978-2-600-01467-0 55 Rhetorica (2013) 31 (3): 337–339. https://doi.org/10.1525/RH.2013.31.3.337 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Review: Eric MacPhail, The Sophistic Renaissance by Eric MacPhail. Rhetorica 1 August 2013; 31 (3): 337–339. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/RH.2013.31.3.337 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2013 by The International Society for the History of Rhetoric. All rights reserved.2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Other| August 01 2013 Addresses of Contributors to This Issue Rhetorica (2013) 31 (3): 348–349. https://doi.org/10.1525/RH.2013.31.3.348 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Addresses of Contributors to This Issue. Rhetorica 1 August 2013; 31 (3): 348–349. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/RH.2013.31.3.348 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2013 by The International Society for the History of Rhetoric. All rights reserved.2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| August 01 2013 Review: Dino Piovan, Memoria e oblio della guerra civile: strategie giudiziarie e racconto del passato in Lisia. Studi e testi di storia antica, 19 by Dino Piovan Dino Piovan, Memoria e oblio della guerra civile: strategie giudiziarie e racconto del passato in Lisia. Studi e testi di storia antica, 19. Pisa: Edizioni ETS, 2011. Pp. 356. ISBN 9788846728258. 22.00 (pb). Rhetorica (2013) 31 (3): 339–342. https://doi.org/10.1525/RH.2013.31.3.339 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Review: Dino Piovan, Memoria e oblio della guerra civile: strategie giudiziarie e racconto del passato in Lisia. Studi e testi di storia antica, 19 by Dino Piovan. Rhetorica 1 August 2013; 31 (3): 339–342. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/RH.2013.31.3.339 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2013 by The International Society for the History of Rhetoric. All rights reserved.2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| August 01 2013 Review: Benjamin Kelly, Petitions, Litigation, and Social Control in Roman Egypt by Benjamin Kelly Benjamin Kelly, Petitions, Litigation, and Social Control in Roman Egypt. (Oxford Studies in Ancient Documents), Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. Pp. xix, 427. ISBN 9780199599615. $150.00. Rhetorica (2013) 31 (3): 345–347. https://doi.org/10.1525/RH.2013.31.3.345 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Review: Benjamin Kelly, Petitions, Litigation, and Social Control in Roman Egypt by Benjamin Kelly. Rhetorica 1 August 2013; 31 (3): 345–347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/RH.2013.31.3.345 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2013 by The International Society for the History of Rhetoric. All rights reserved.2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| August 01 2013 Review: Divine Rhetoric: Essays on the Sermons of Laurence Sterne. Edited with an introduction by W. B. Gerard Divine Rhetoric: Essays on the Sermons of Laurence Sterne. Edited with an introduction by W. B. Gerard. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2010. 284 pp. + CD. ISBN 978-1611491210 $62.50 Rhetorica (2013) 31 (3): 331–334. https://doi.org/10.1525/RH.2013.31.3.331 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Review: Divine Rhetoric: Essays on the Sermons of Laurence Sterne. Edited with an introduction by W. B. Gerard. Rhetorica 1 August 2013; 31 (3): 331–334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/RH.2013.31.3.331 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2013 by The International Society for the History of Rhetoric. All rights reserved.2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

In this poster presentation, the author traces health communication in online spaces, especially conversations about hypothyroidism on Twitter. Specifically, the author looks at how participants on Twitter use the hashtag #hypothyroidism for patient agency and advocacy. The strength of ties between #hypothyroidism (the Twitter hashtag) and the actors necessary for its existence is also discussed. This poster presentation argues that Twitter can strengthen patient agency and advocacy in both online and offline relationships between hypothyroidism patients and healthcare professionals. Patient agency and advocacy is accomplished because Twitter helps to build communities of support between and among patients and professionals through the immediacy and accessibility of information.

The contemporary American political landscape is littered with talk of apology. Throughout the 2012 presidential campaign, both camps sparred over when, why, and to whom apologies should be made. The most striking clash occurred in July 2012. The Obama camp ran a series of campaign advertisements alleging that the then presumptive Republican nominee had in fact remained at Bain Capitol in a leadership role longer than he had claimed, bolstering their characterization of Romney as a businessman whose business was not good for America.1 When Romney's aide failed to quiet the critique by claiming that the candidate had “retired retroactively” (DeLong 2012), Romney himself took to the airwaves to speak to the situation. On Friday, 13 July, he appeared on five different networks to condemn these types of attacks and to call for a campaign centered on issues, sidestepping the question of his tenure at Bain. In an ABC interview, Romney emphatically stated, “He [Obama] sure as heck ought to say that he's sorry for the kinds of attacks that are coming from his team” (Shear 2012). When asked, Obama and his team refused comment. The next day, however, a video advertisement posted on YouTube titled “Mitt Romney: Asking for Apologies”—attributed to the “Truth Team”—did respond in a manner that was read by pundits as a blatant refusal of Romney's demand for an apology. Interspersed with clips of Romney claiming that Obama does not understand freedom and that he should be apologizing to America rather than for it, appeared three simple blue screens that read: “Mitt Romney. He sure asks for a lot of apologies. When he's not busy launching attacks.”This exchange triggered almost predictable responses from political commentators. On the right, Obama's refusal to apologize was read as a white flag—an admission that he could say nothing without publicly acknowledging the lies he told for political gain. On the left, Romney's demand was read as an attempt to evade the questions raised by the advertisements, although some read it as even less than this, equating Romney's demand with “crying uncle” (Easley 2012). Had the back and forth of the commentary been even somewhat novel, it might have become exhausting. As it played out, however, it just lay there already dead in the water, waiting for the next wave of issues and predictable responses to wash over it.One might certainly read this scene with a sort of cynicism or even nostalgia for a time in our political life when things were otherwise—when the truth of speech mattered or apologies were read on a moral register. I think both attitudes, however, miss the larger point. The quickness with which we discount political speech, having seen for years what lies behind the curtain, and our obsession with memories of times that perhaps never were, keep us from investigating how this beastly creature, the “demand for apology,” operates. We say almost nothing about it, preferring to lament the state of political rhetoric more generally or reading it from and through established political stances. The rich body of literature produced by rhetorical theorists and critics about apology itself offers us important insights into the potential and limits of such speech acts. Yet these studies rarely include a sustained investigation of the demand for apology, and if they do, they make certain presumptions about the operations of demands that are suspect. In response, this essay highlights the need for a study of the rhetorical complexities of demands that examines the conditions through which these speech acts structure and invoke another's response, revealing how a demand for apology both constitutes and is conditioned by the scene in which this demand takes place. Implicitly then, this argument pushes us toward a renewed interrogation of rhetoric's scene of address.Demands for apology are curious in that apologies proffered in response sometimes fail to sufficiently resolve the demand. Such scenes are familiar to us. I demand an apology from you for something you have said or done, and you turn to say “sorry.” Your apology though, however uttered, does not fully satisfy me. Perhaps it is because I had to ask you to apologize in the first place, to point out that what you have said or done is wrong or injurious. Perhaps it is because, given the injury I incurred, your apology does not quite feel like enough. In any case, the anger or hurt that prompted my demand might in fact remain even after you apologize. Such emotions might be magnified in the context of apologies offered on behalf of a state to a specific group or population. It is easy to imagine how apologies might fail to “make up for” historical atrocities. “We're sorry” can hardly right involuntary internment, abuse of indigenous peoples, institutionalized racism, or genocide. But, to be fair, demands for apology rarely ask this much; that is, they do not ask for the situation to be “fixed” but rather addressed (ethically).That an apology conditions and performs an ethical address is worth noting only if we understand the complex ways in which language trips us up, causing the apology to stumble in the face of a demand. Sara Ahmed's work here is helpful. She argues that the difficulty of any apology is that its utterance cannot on its own perform the work that a demand demands. “Of course,” she explains, “the gap between saying sorry and being sorry cannot be filled, even by a ‘good performance’ of the utterance” (2004, 114). Felicitous or not, the performance of an apology—both what it says and how it is said—cannot effect, guarantee, or authenticate what Ahmed takes as the object of a demand for apology: feeling sorry. Thus into this scene of address—and Ahmed is clear that apology must be read as an interlocutionary scene—a problem of recognition appears that confounds the work of an apology. She explains: So the receiver has to judge whether the utterance is readable as an apology. So the following question becomes intelligible: Does “this” apology “apologise”? The action of the apology is curiously dependent on its reception. The apology may “do something” in the event that the other is willing to receive the utterance as an apology, a willingness, which will depend on the conditions in which the speech act was uttered. (2004, 115) The success of an apology depends then not on what is said or the emotion it conveys but on how this apology is “taken up” and read. Thus the one who demands an apology judges whether the apology meets the conditions of recognizability in the particular context.Paradoxically, however, the very terms that render an apology recognizable might effectively strip the demand for this apology of its force. In recent work, Adam Ellwanger suggests that apologies are only read as such when they perform metanoia, the subject's internal conversion or transformation. (I have apologized when I show you that I am a changed person.) Ellwanger demonstrates quite convincingly, however, that the performance of this metanoia in an apology negates or undermines the force of the demand. Understanding apologies as (speech) acts of public humiliation that ultimately bring the offender in line with public norms of civility (2012, 309), Ellwanger claims that in the apology, “the activity of confession itself becomes the punitive mechanism. This creates the illusion of self-censure, a phenomenon that is crucial to punitive apologetics” (2012, 310). The apology thus renders the demand that occasioned it at best irrelevant and at worst logically suspect. What makes it irrelevant is that the self-punishment enacted in the apology appears to be self-motivated; the confession evidences an internal transformation of a subject that, for Ellwanger, occurs “independently of his accusers' demands” (2012, 324). I see the error of my ways and find myself a changed person because of what I now know and understand. The demand is occluded because I am both the origin and the effect of this self-transformation. And what makes it logically suspect is that the demand for apology promises forgiveness in exchange for a form of punishment predicated on relationships that prohibit this forgiveness. As Ellwanger explains, “The covertly punitive goals of the call for apology ensure that the dialogue will be defined by agonism and antipathy on both sides—conditions that make forgiveness and reconciliation all but impossible” (2012, 326).That demands for apology end in paradox may lead to the conclusion that discourses of apology might have limited application in public arenas. Ellwanger himself argues that “a space that is more conducive to honest dialogue and negotiation” is possible if only we rethink the demand for apology as “the kategoria that initiates a conversation where the accused offender engages in a vocal defense of himself, while the accusers seek to prove his guilt” (2012, 326). For him, it is best not to force “a necessarily dubious metanoia” (2012, 326). Instead, we should understand apologetic speech as an antagonistic debate that allows “for the possibility that the offender does not want reconciliation” (2012, 326). In the end, Ellwanger claims that “minimizing the emphasis on forgiveness and admitting the conflict at the heart of public apologetic discourse might temper our expectations for its outcomes” (2012, 326).Although Ellwanger is right to caution against an understanding of apology as an act that brings about a total reconciliation or transformation, it is hard to imagine how the demand for apology can bring about anything but stasis. If, for instance, we read our original scene through Ellwanger, we see how Romney's demand for an apology becomes the occasion for a conversation in which both parties might state their case without seeking to reconcile their positions. Romney levels an accusation that the Obama team is telling lies for political gain rather than engaging the issues; the “Truth Team” opts for a preschooler's response of “he did it first” rather than explains why Obama will not or should not apologize for the claims made in the advertisement. In this example, the call of the demand and the response of the (non)apology become unhinged. The advertisement for Obama does not address the complaints Romney levels. Instead, it takes the occasion of the demand to address the American people, suggesting that we are in on the joke that is the demand. Romney is no worse for wear, though, given that his demand for apology never turned on Obama's response (or nonresponse, as the case may be). That Romney issued the demand allows him to stake a claim to a moral position within the political scene. The content of the demand is to some extent irrelevant because it is the act of demanding itself that is meant to accomplish his goals. These goals are revealed in what he says immediately after he issues his demand for apology. Romney comments that the president's allegations are “very disappointing” given his promises in the first campaign (Shear 2012). Romney thereby claims the high ground, a position from which he takes authority to pass judgment on Obama's speech and actions. What is so interesting in this overly familiar political strategy is that it renders any response inconsequential. This demand does not call for a response or invoke an other.2 It is instead a performance of the place (and the power) the speaker claims by virtue of the demand. All are called here to witness this spectacle but certainly not to engage it or question it. So the “conversation” begun by the demand ends with it as well, revealing a stasis that might be honest at the cost of truth.This is not, as some rhetorical scholars would have us believe, the necessary result of a political life constituted in and through agonistic debate. It gestures to a larger set of questions about the rhetorical-ethical contours of the demand for apology for which current scholarship fails to fully account. How does the demand invoke the other or bind another in an address? How does this invocation place the interlocutors in relation to each other? What are the conditions in which this relation functions ethically? The complexity of these questions confound us when we take for granted the conditions of the demand's recognizability. Considerations of the demand for apology (which may be treated as supplemental to the exploration of apology itself) often proceed from the premise that the terms of a demand merely represent or narrate some previous injury, suggesting an ontologically and temporally prior recognition of a particular history of injury or violence. When demands for apology are made, that is, we presume that they seek redress for historical acts that have already been deemed and recognized as morally wrong. Ahmed, for instance, claims that a demand for apology “exposes the history of violence to others, who are now called upon to bear witness to the injustice” (2004, 119). As an expository act, all the demand seemingly does, then, is carry forward a history that it itself does not constitute or color. Interlocutors in this scene are asked to “bear witness” to this history or respond to it through an apology, accounting for their role in this history. Because we do not account for the history itself—its constitution and the rhetorical conditions in which it is addressed to an audience—we lose a sense of the very thing that marks a demand as a demand: risk. As Alexander García Düttmann explains: One can say that a demand is marked by an uncertainty because every demand requires uncertainty as the medium in which it is raised. One can say that a demand is marked by an uncertainty because nothing ensures that a response will ensue, whether the one who makes the demand encounters indifference or whether there is no one to hear the demand. Finally one can say that a demand is marked by an uncertainty because the seriousness of a demand (for recognition) cannot be guaranteed; on each occasion one must decide anew whether another person's demand (for recognition) is feigned or whether it is meant seriously. (2000, 10–11) Risk attends the demand not only because we cannot predict or guarantee a response but also because the demand itself seeks recognition as a demand. In the case of a demand for apology, the history revealed in the demand is an uncertain history because it needs recognition for both the content of the history (is this what happened?) and the telling of the story (is this telling an act of laying bare history or is it the premise of a joke?).Theorists of demands for apology also seem to presume a kind of standing for the subject of the demand. We are, as we must be, always already on the scene when we give an account of a demand for an apology. To speak of or theorize this demand and its effect, that is, one presumes that there is an already established relationship between the one who demands and the addressee of that demand. We might argue that this relationship is inaugurated in and through the injury and therefore has been structured prior to this demand. Is it the case, however, that if our account of the demand precedes from an already inhabited scene, then it must follow that the demand had no influence on setting this scene? In other words, how might the demand change the structure of address? To answer these questions, we turn for a moment to a consideration of the scene itself. In Ellwanger's work we are met with a claim that demands for apology operate as a kategoria—an accusation made in a court of law that calls for a defense. Linking contemporary demands for apology to the kategoria of antiquity, Ellwanger argues that rethinking demands as the beginning of a conversation can help us understand the role of apology in creating productive debate. Yet what Ellwanger, like many others, ignores is that the kategoria binds the other in conversation because it invokes the authority and the conventions of the legal scene. The accusation calls on the other to respond because it speaks in the name of law. Here is where the Burkean understanding of a scene fails us. The scene is not merely a “container” for the speech act, a place or landscape in which a demand is made. The force of the demand comes from and constitutes the scene in which it operates. As Judith Butler reminds us, “In order to have that relation of responsiveness, one needs already to be in a relationship to a set of others in which one can be addressed or can be appealed to in some way. In other words, one needs to be disposed to hearing, one needs to be in the scene of interlocution, one needs first to establish such a scene in order to be responsive” (Murray 2007, 418–19). We are called then to understand the ways that demands for apology are conditioned by and structure scenes of address. To do so illustrates how the demand places the speaker at risk. One can demand recognition only if one is dislocated by it. I demand an apology not as the subject who was injured but as the subject whose standing—the right and authority to speak before the other—is in jeopardy. To make a demand places me in a tenuous position. Against a history of violence or injury that almost always revokes my authority to speak, I demand “as if” I already inhabit a place in the scene of address that authorizes my speech and obligates you to respond, aware that it might establish the very conditions under which I suffered injury.To examine a demand for apology rhetorically is thus to read for how language mediates the risk of subjects and histories as it constitutes the scene of address in which it operates. With this insight, we return to our beginning. Romney's demand for apology, when examined closely, shows itself to be simply obscene. The language of his demand carries and covers over a history that authorizes Romney's standing in the scene. “He sure as heck ought to say that he's sorry for the kinds of attacks that are coming from his team” (Shear 2012). This might be the “folksy” language of George Bush or Sarah Palin to which we've become accustomed. But it also harkens back to a 1950s suburban vernacular in which Romney's standing to demand an apology would have gone unquestioned. While conjuring a scene that confirms his own authority to make the demand in the terms that he does, Romney's language mitigates the risk associated with claiming a place in the scene of address by sealing off this scene and placing it against (and the contemporary political it against the scene. Romney's demand is not issued to Obama out for a the demand invokes no one in particular even as it to witness the attacks that are the of his The risk is because the scene of the demand is with the the perhaps more with the contemporary political scene at demand is thus offered from an that can be seen but not addressed or in the As a his demand offers the a of the and place by a different As an act that the scene of though, the demand speech, the that speak within and to it. In the place of speech, we are only with a of that of truth to the very of political

Corporate social media policies construct what Herndl and Licona term “constrained agency,” an ambiguous, contradictory agent function. Drawing on an analysis of 31 corporate social media policies, this article argues that these policies create constrained agency in two ways: they establish contradictory expectations for a writer's voice by requesting both individual and corporate-friendly voices, and they create a seemingly paradoxical situation where employees both do and do not represent the company. These policies shed light on the complex constructions of agency within corporations and encapsulate the workplace tensions that accompany the affordances of social media tools.

Building on the authors' prior studies that investigate uses and perceptions of online social networks, this study critically explores the emerging social networking culture. In doing so, the research seeks to identify possible constructs that can be used to predict social networking behavior that may then be tested in a future study. The study relies on multiple user perspectives, drawing its participants from international students at two universities, one in Australia and one in the United States. Throughout this process, the utility of using the lens of national culture versus using other lenses is also examined. While the qualitative data suggests somewhat divergent approaches to social networking in different countries, a number of common themes were also identified. Two themes which appeared across national boundaries were changes in use over time and privacy and trust.

Research Article| June 01 2013 The U.S. Catholic Bishops, "Religious Freedom," and the 2012 Presidential Election Campaign: A Reflection Steven R. Goldzwig Steven R. Goldzwig Steven R. Goldzwig is Professor and Chair of Communication Studies at Marquette University in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (2): 369–384. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.2.0369 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Steven R. Goldzwig; The U.S. Catholic Bishops, "Religious Freedom," and the 2012 Presidential Election Campaign: A Reflection. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 June 2013; 16 (2): 369–384. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.2.0369 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| June 01 2013 “Where Mitt Romney Takes His Family to Church”: Mike Huckabee's GOP Convention Speech, the “Mormon Hurdle,” and the Rhetoric of Proportion Gary S. Selby Gary S. Selby Gary S. Selby is Professor of Communication in Seaver College, Pepperdine University in Malibu, California. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (2): 385–400. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.2.0385 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Gary S. Selby; “Where Mitt Romney Takes His Family to Church”: Mike Huckabee's GOP Convention Speech, the “Mormon Hurdle,” and the Rhetoric of Proportion. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 June 2013; 16 (2): 385–400. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.2.0385 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal Issue Section: Forum You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| June 01 2013 Religious Dissociation in 2012 Campaign Discourse Kristy Maddux Kristy Maddux Kristy Maddux is Associate Professor of Communication at the University of Maryland, College Park. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (2): 355–368. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.2.0355 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Kristy Maddux; Religious Dissociation in 2012 Campaign Discourse. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 June 2013; 16 (2): 355–368. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.2.0355 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| May 01 2013 Review: Classroom Commentaries: Teaching the Poetria nova across Medieval and Renaissance Europe, by Marjorie Curry Woods Marjorie Curry Woods, Classroom Commentaries: Teaching the Poetria nova across Medieval and Renaissance Europe (Text and Context 2), Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2010. xlii + 367 pp. ISBN 9780814211090. Rhetorica (2013) 31 (2): 223–225. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2013.31.2.223 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Review: Classroom Commentaries: Teaching the Poetria nova across Medieval and Renaissance Europe, by Marjorie Curry Woods. Rhetorica 1 May 2013; 31 (2): 223–225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2013.31.2.223 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2013 by The International Society for the History of Rhetoric. All rights reserved.2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| May 01 2013 Review: Clio sous le regard d'Hermès. L'utilisation de l'histoire dans la rhétorique ancienne de l'époque hellénistique à l'Antiquité Tardive, by Pierre-Louis Malosse, Marie-Pierre Noël, Bernard Schouler Pierre-Louis Malosse, Marie-Pierre Noël et Bernard Schouler, eds., Clio sous le regard d'Hermès. L'utilisation de l'histoire dans la rhétorique ancienne de l'époque hellénistique à l'Antiquité Tardive (Cardo 8), Alessandria: Edizioni dell'Orso, 2010, XI, 248 pp. ISBN 9788862742474. Rhetorica (2013) 31 (2): 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2013.31.2.229 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Review: Clio sous le regard d'Hermès. L'utilisation de l'histoire dans la rhétorique ancienne de l'époque hellénistique à l'Antiquité Tardive, by Pierre-Louis Malosse, Marie-Pierre Noël, Bernard Schouler. Rhetorica 1 May 2013; 31 (2): 229–232. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2013.31.2.229 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2013 by The International Society for the History of Rhetoric. All rights reserved.2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Other| May 01 2013 Addresses of Contributors to this Issue Rhetorica (2013) 31 (2): 236–237. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2013.31.2.236 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Addresses of Contributors to this Issue. Rhetorica 1 May 2013; 31 (2): 236–237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2013.31.2.236 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2013 by The International Society for the History of Rhetoric. All rights reserved.2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| May 01 2013 Review: Rhetoric Beyond Words: Delight and Persuasion in the Arts of the Middle Ages, by Carruthers, Mary Carruthers, Mary, ed., Rhetoric Beyond Words: Delight and Persuasion in the Arts of the Middle Ages. (Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature, ed. Alastair Minnis). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. xii + 316 pp. ISBN 9780521515306. Rhetorica (2013) 31 (2): 220–223. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2013.31.2.220 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Review: Rhetoric Beyond Words: Delight and Persuasion in the Arts of the Middle Ages, by Carruthers, Mary. Rhetorica 1 May 2013; 31 (2): 220–223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2013.31.2.220 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2013 by The International Society for the History of Rhetoric. All rights reserved.2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| May 01 2013 Review: Signs of Light: French and British Theories of Linguistic Communication, 1648–1789, by Matthew Lauzon Matthew Lauzon, Signs of Light: French and British Theories of Linguistic Communication, 1648–1789, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2010. 256 pp. ISBN 9780801448478. Rhetorica (2013) 31 (2): 226–228. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2013.31.2.226 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Review: Signs of Light: French and British Theories of Linguistic Communication, 1648–1789, by Matthew Lauzon. Rhetorica 1 May 2013; 31 (2): 226–228. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2013.31.2.226 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2013 by The International Society for the History of Rhetoric. All rights reserved.2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| May 01 2013 Review: [Quintiliano] Il veleno versato (Declamazioni maggiori, 17), by Lucia Pasetti Lucia Pasetti, [Quintiliano] Il veleno versato (Declamazioni maggiori, 17), Cassino: Edizioni Università di Cassino, 2011, 252 pp. ISBN 978-88-8317-055-3. Rhetorica (2013) 31 (2): 233–235. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2013.31.2.233 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Review: [Quintiliano] Il veleno versato (Declamazioni maggiori, 17), by Lucia Pasetti. Rhetorica 1 May 2013; 31 (2): 233–235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2013.31.2.233 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2013 by The International Society for the History of Rhetoric. All rights reserved.2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Review Article| April 01 2013 “We therefore ben tawht of that was write tho”: Teaching Gower in the Classroom Approaches to Teaching the Poetry of John Gower. Edited by R. F. Yeager and Brian W. Gastle. New York: Modern Language Association, 2011. Conrad van Dijk Conrad van Dijk Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Pedagogy (2013) 13 (2): 383–385. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-1958530 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Conrad van Dijk; “We therefore ben tawht of that was write tho”: Teaching Gower in the Classroom. Pedagogy 1 April 2013; 13 (2): 383–385. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-1958530 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsPedagogy Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 by Duke University Press2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Review Article| April 01 2013 Teachable Henryson, Accessible Middle Scots Robert Henryson: The Complete Works. Edited by Parkinson, David J.. TEAMS Middle English Texts Series. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, 2010. Julie Orlemanski Julie Orlemanski Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Pedagogy (2013) 13 (2): 387–390. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-1958539 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Julie Orlemanski; Teachable Henryson, Accessible Middle Scots. Pedagogy 1 April 2013; 13 (2): 387–390. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-1958539 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter Books & JournalsAll JournalsPedagogy Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 by Duke University Press2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal Issue Section: Reviews You do not currently have access to this content.

Review Article| April 01 2013 John Lydgate’s “Noble Devices” John Lydgate: Mummings and Entertainments. Edited by Sponsler, Claire. TEAMS Middle English Text Series. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, 2010. Corey Sparks Corey Sparks Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Pedagogy (2013) 13 (2): 395–397. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-1958557 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Corey Sparks; John Lydgate’s “Noble Devices”. Pedagogy 1 April 2013; 13 (2): 395–397. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-1958557 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsPedagogy Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 by Duke University Press2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Review Article| April 01 2013 De-centering Chaucer, Emphasizing His Contemporaries A Companion to Chaucer and His Contemporaries: Texts and Contexts. Edited by Laurel Amtower and Jacqueline Vanhoutte. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2009. Nathanial B. Smith Nathanial B. Smith Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Pedagogy (2013) 13 (2): 391–393. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-1958548 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Nathanial B. Smith; De-centering Chaucer, Emphasizing His Contemporaries. Pedagogy 1 April 2013; 13 (2): 391–393. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-1958548 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter Books & JournalsAll JournalsPedagogy Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 by Duke University Press2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal Issue Section: Reviews You do not currently have access to this content.

Editorial| April 01 2013 A Note from the Editors Jennifer L. Holberg; Jennifer L. Holberg Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Marcy Taylor Marcy Taylor Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Pedagogy (2013) 13 (2): 203–204. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-1963195 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Jennifer L. Holberg, Marcy Taylor; A Note from the Editors. Pedagogy 1 April 2013; 13 (2): 203–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-1963195 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter Books & JournalsAll JournalsPedagogy Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 by Duke University Press2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Review Article| April 01 2013 Re-forming Our Early English Curricula Form and Reform: Reading across the Fifteenth Century. Edited by Shannon Gayk and Kathleen Tonry. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2011. Katherine Steele Brokaw Katherine Steele Brokaw Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Pedagogy (2013) 13 (2): 371–373. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-1958503 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Katherine Steele Brokaw; Re-forming Our Early English Curricula. Pedagogy 1 April 2013; 13 (2): 371–373. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-1958503 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsPedagogy Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 by Duke University Press2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

In ninth grade, my son became absorbed in writing a persuasive political essay.To write it, he drew knowledge from his considerable everyday literacy practice-blogs, polls, YouTube, Wikipedia, and a political forum he has

Book Review| March 01 2013 An Army of Lions: The Civil Rights Struggle before the NAACP An Army of Lions: The Civil Rights Struggle before the NAACP. By Shawn Leigh Alexander. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012; pp xviii + 382. $49.95 cloth. Stephen Schneider Stephen Schneider University of Louisville Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (1): 185–188. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0185 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Stephen Schneider; An Army of Lions: The Civil Rights Struggle before the NAACP. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 March 2013; 16 (1): 185–188. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0185 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| March 01 2013 On Martin Luther King Jr. and the Landscape of Civil Rights Rhetoric Behind the Dream: The Making of the Speech That Transformed a Nation. By Clarence Jones and Stuart Connelly. New York: Palgrave, 2011; pp. 224. $22.00 cloth; $14.00 paperKing's Dream: The Legacy of Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" Speech. By Eric Sundquist. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009; pp. viii + 295. $14.00 paper"Making a Way out of No Way": Martin Luther King's Proverbial Rhetoric. By Wolfgang Mieder. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2010; pp. xiv + 551. $169.95 clothMartin Luther King and the Rhetoric of Freedom: The Exodus Narrative in America's Struggle for Civil Rights. By Gary Selby. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2008; pp. xii + 217. $34.95 paperThe Word of the Lord Is Upon Me: The Righteous Performance of Martin Luther King, Jr. By Jonathan Rieder. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press, 2008; pp. xi + 394. $18.95 paper Keith D. Miller Keith D. Miller Keith D. Miller is Professor of English at Arizona State University. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (1): 167–184. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0167 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Keith D. Miller; On Martin Luther King Jr. and the Landscape of Civil Rights Rhetoric. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 March 2013; 16 (1): 167–184. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0167 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| March 01 2013 Martin Luther King's Biblical Epic Martin Luther King's Biblical Epic. By Keith D. Miller. Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi, 2012; pp. xiii + 245. $55.00 cloth. Frank A. Thomas Frank A. Thomas University of Memphis Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (1): 188–191. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0188 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Frank A. Thomas; Martin Luther King's Biblical Epic. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 March 2013; 16 (1): 188–191. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0188 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| March 01 2013 Abraham Lincoln and the Structure of Reason Abraham Lincoln and the Structure of Reason. By David Hirsch and Dan Van Haften. El Dorado Hills, CA: Savas Beatie, 2010; pp. xxiv + 439. $34.95 cloth. David Zarefsky David Zarefsky Northwestern University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (1): 194–198. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0194 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation David Zarefsky; Abraham Lincoln and the Structure of Reason. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 March 2013; 16 (1): 194–198. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0194 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| March 01 2013 Citizens of the World: Pluralism, Migration, and Practices of Citizenship Citizens of the World: Pluralism, Migration, and Practices of Citizenship. By Robert Danisch. Amsterdam: Rodopi Press, 2011; pp. xi + 218. $62.00 paper. Megan Foley Megan Foley Mississippi State University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (1): 206–209. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0206 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Megan Foley; Citizens of the World: Pluralism, Migration, and Practices of Citizenship. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 March 2013; 16 (1): 206–209. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0206 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Other| March 01 2013 Index to Rhetoric & Public Affairs: Volume 1 (1998)—Volume 15 (2012) Jaclyn Bissell Jaclyn Bissell Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (1): 133–166. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0133 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Jaclyn Bissell; Index to Rhetoric & Public Affairs: Volume 1 (1998)—Volume 15 (2012). Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 March 2013; 16 (1): 133–166. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0133 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| March 01 2013 Conversational Rhetoric: The Rise and Fall of a Women's Tradition, 1600–1900 Conversational Rhetoric: The Rise and Fall of a Women's Tradition, 1600–1900. By Jane Donawerth. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 2012; pp xi + 205. $60.00 cloth. Emily Berg Paup Emily Berg Paup The College of St. Benedict's and St. John's University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (1): 213–216. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0213 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Emily Berg Paup; Conversational Rhetoric: The Rise and Fall of a Women's Tradition, 1600–1900. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 March 2013; 16 (1): 213–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0213 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| March 01 2013 The Genuine Teachers of This Art: Rhetorical Education in Antiquity The Genuine Teachers of This Art: Rhetorical Education in Antiquity. By Jeffrey Walker. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2011; pp. 356. $49.95 cloth. David M. Timmerman David M. Timmerman Monmouth College Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (1): 216–219. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0216 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation David M. Timmerman; The Genuine Teachers of This Art: Rhetorical Education in Antiquity. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 March 2013; 16 (1): 216–219. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0216 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| March 01 2013 Presidential Temples: How Memorials and Libraries Shape Public Memory Presidential Temples: How Memorials and Libraries Shape Public Memory. By Benjamin Hufbauer. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2006; pp. xi + 270. $35.00 cloth. Allison M. Prasch Allison M. Prasch University of Minnesota Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (1): 198–202. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0198 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Allison M. Prasch; Presidential Temples: How Memorials and Libraries Shape Public Memory. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 March 2013; 16 (1): 198–202. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0198 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| March 01 2013 Spirits of the Cold War: Contesting Worldviews in the Classical Age of American Security Strategy Spirits of the Cold War: Contesting Worldviews in the Classical Age of American Security Strategy. By Ned O'Gorman. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press; 2012. pp. xi + 321. $59.95 cloth. Timothy Barney Timothy Barney University of Richmond Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Rhetoric and Public Affairs (2013) 16 (1): 202–206. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0202 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Timothy Barney; Spirits of the Cold War: Contesting Worldviews in the Classical Age of American Security Strategy. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 1 March 2013; 16 (1): 202–206. doi: https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.16.1.0202 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectiveMichigan State University PressRhetoric and Public Affairs Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2013 Michigan State University Board of Trustees2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Book Review| February 01 2013 Review: Persona. L'élaboration d'une notion rhétorique au Ier siècle av. J.-C. – Volume I : Antécédents grecs et première rhétorique latine, by Charles Guérin Charles Guérin, Persona. L'élaboration d'une notion rhétorique au Ier siècle av. J.-C. – Volume I : Antécédents grecs et première rhétorique latine, Vrin, Paris, 2009(431 pp. ISBN 978-2-7116-2234-4) – Volume II : Théorisation cicéronienne de la persona oratoire, Vrin, Paris, 2011. 474 pp. ISBN 978-2-7116-2351-8 Rhetorica (2013) 31 (1): 128–131. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2013.31.1.128 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Review: Persona. L'élaboration d'une notion rhétorique au Ier siècle av. J.-C. – Volume I : Antécédents grecs et première rhétorique latine, by Charles Guérin. Rhetorica 1 February 2013; 31 (1): 128–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2013.31.1.128 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. © 2013 by The International Society for the History of Rhetoric. All rights reserved.2013 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.