Abstract
As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools develop, questions about the legality and ethics of their constitution arise. This conversation shaper calls on stakeholders in writing centers to begin meaningfully addressing that training methods for, and generated outputs of, popular GenAI tools exhibit source use which may not meet the current academic integrity standards widely upheld by writing centers. Acknowledging this dissonance in future discussions paves the way for responsibly and transparently incorporating GenAI into writing center work. It also ensures that we pay attention to new technologies (Selfe, 1999) and more critically interpret our reality via a multitude of perspectives (McKinney, 2013). The shaper concludes by contending that writing center workers, and in particular, peer tutors, are well positioned to act as thought leaders regarding the future of writing with GenAI.
- Journal
- The Peer Review
- Published
- 2025-04
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Subjects
- academic integrity, artificial intelligence, copyright, chatbots, ChatGPT, generative AI, intellectual property, plagiarism, large language models, text and data mining, writing centers
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Citation data not yet available for this article.
Citation data is not available for The Peer Review. This journal's publisher does not deposit reference lists with CrossRef.
Related Articles
-
The Peer Review Apr 2025Melody Denny
-
The Peer Review Apr 2025Alexandra Krasova; Mahmoud Othman
-
Writing Center Journal 2025Centering AI Literacy: Exploring Brazilian International Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT and Peer Tutoring ↗Leigh Ann Dunning; Raissa Borges De Oliveira Leal
-
Composition Forum Mar 2026
-
College Composition and Communication Sep 2025Christopher Basgier; Lydia Wilkes