Clitic subjects as landmarks in the writing production process: A study based on a keylog-derived corpus of writing bursts
Abstract
Bursts of writing, extracted from online recordings of the writing process, have proved an invaluable vantage point into the cognitive mechanisms at work during written language production. Crucially, they show that writers, much like speakers, produce language through a sequence of small ‘chunks’, patterns-like groupings of words that do not necessarily match the structures of theoretical grammars. As such, they are intriguing objects, whose linguistic properties are yet to be understood. To contribute to this endeavor, we track all instances of French so-called clitic subjects in a corpus of 81 keylogs of short essays written by undergraduate students in experimental conditions. We show that these clitic subjects are attracted to the burst-initial position, favoring resumption of the production after revision events. Moreover, they also act like discursive hubs in that writers are more likely to revise up to a clitic subject and restart from there, possibly relying on an entirely different structure. Therefore, they play the role of landmarks in the writing process, from which information can flow, and to which writers can get back to develop alternative discursive strategies. These results hint that the writing process and the information structure of the product are likely to be intimately intricated.
- Journal
- Journal of Writing Research
- Published
- 2025-02-01
- DOI
- 10.17239/jowr-2025.16.03.04
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- OA PDF Diamond
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Journal of Writing Research Jun 2025Mari Mar Boillos; Nahia Idoiaga
-
Pedagogy Oct 2024rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development revision argument collaborative writing assessment writing program administration multimodality multilingual writers literacy studies race and writing disability studies community literacy editorial matter
-
Assessing Writing Oct 2024L2 master’s and doctoral students’ preferences for supervisor written feedback on their theses/dissertations ↗MohammadHamed Hoomanfard
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2023The relationship between peer feedback features and revision sources mediated by feedback acceptance: The effect on undergraduate students’ writing performance ↗Qi Lu; Yuan Yao; Xinhua Zhu
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric Dec 2021Daniel M. Gross