Abstract
This research analyzes the discourse functions of grammatical subjects used in results and discussion sections of research articles across four disciplines. To this end, sixteen results and discussion sections from four disciplines, namely, English Language Teaching, Economics, Biology and Civil Engineering (four from each discipline), were analyzed using the categorizations of discourse functions of grammatical subjects established by Gosden (1993). There were marked disciplinary differences in terms of the discourse functions served through the application of the grammatical subjects in the four sets of the results and discussion sections. These disciplinary differences were clearly shown in all the four domains of the discourse functions of the grammatical subject along with their subcategories. This result suggests that the discourse functions of the grammatical subject are strongly related to the public aims, norms and conventions of specific disciplines as well in the contexts in which it is realized.
- Journal
- Journal of Writing Research
- Published
- 2014-10-01
- DOI
- 10.17239/jowr-2014.06.02.2
- CompPile
- Open Access
- OA PDF Diamond
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Apr 2026Suo Yan Mei; Suo Yan Ju; Zarima Mohd Zakaria
-
Journal of Response to Writing Apr 2026More Than Treating Errors: Bridging the Gaps and Expanding the Agenda for Scholarship on Teacher Written Feedback for L2 Writers ↗Goldstein, Lynn; Kohls, Robert
-
Literacy in Composition Studies Feb 2026Jason Hockaday
-
Assessing Writing Jan 2026Assessing the effects of explicit coherence instruction on EFL students’ integrated writing performance ↗Xi Li; Mo Chen
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Sep 2025Ena Belamaric