Abstract

The idea that engineers are graduating without the necessary communication skills, specifically written communication, is not new. In the past 25 years, changes have been made both in accreditation requirements and in engineering program curriculums to work to improve students’ writing skills and make their writing better align with the needs of industry, and research is emerging that considers industry standards and how those standards can be applied to the classroom. One challenge is that the characteristics of quality writing are not always the same for the industry and the classroom, which can create problems for new graduates entering the workforce. This article looks at how effective writing is defined by both academics and professional engineers. Drawing on a study by Cunningham & Stewart (2012), which researched the criteria professional engineers consider essential in effective writing, this article provides the results of a survey of instructors of introductory professional and technical writing classes. The survey was designed to determine the characteristics the instructors use when grading writing assignments. The results are then compared to the characteristics of quality writing as identified by the engineers. In addition, the article reviews assessment rubrics to identify criteria used when evaluating writing and compares these criteria to the qualities of effective writing as determined by the Analytic Writing Continuum, part of the National Writing Project. After determining gaps between industry and academics, the article considers ways to bridge those gaps, including working with professional engineers to obtain sample documents, increasing reading and evaluation of engineering documents in professional and technical writing classes, and using interdisciplinary approaches to course design and instruction.

Journal
Writing and Pedagogy
Published
2023-02-13
DOI
10.1558/wap.21638
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. Anastasiu, L., Anastasiu, A., Dumitran, M., Crizboi, C., Holmaghi, A. & Roman, M. N. (2017). How to align the…
  2. Conrad, S. (2017). A comparison of practitioner and student writing in civil engineering. Journal of Engineer…
  3. Cunningham, D. & Stewart, J. (2012). Perceptions and practices: A survey of professional engineers and archit…
  4. Darling, A. L. & Dannels, D. P. (2003). Practicing engineers talk about the importance of talk: A report on t…
  5. Giroux, C. S. & Moje, E. B. (2017). Learning from the professions: Examining how, why, and when engineers rea…
  6. Lappalainen, P. (2009). Communication as part of the engineering skills set. European Journal of Engineering …
  7. Lenard, D. B. & Pintarić, L. (2018). Comparison of employers’ and students’ perceptions regarding communicati…
  8. Nair, C. S., Patil, A. & Mertova, P. (2009). Re-engineering graduate skills – a case study. European Journal …
  9. Passow, H. J. & Passow, C. H. (2017). What competencies should undergraduate engineering programs emphasize? …
  10. Prados, J. W., Peterson, G. D. & Lattuca, L. R. (2005). Quality assurance of engineering education through ac…
  11. Ravesteijn, W., De Graaff, E. & Kroesen, O. (2006). Engineering the future: The social necessity of communica…
  12. Whiteman, W. E. (2011). The impact of EC2000 on mechanical engineering curricula: A follow-up study. Internat…