Abstract
Peer feedback is often considered a critical component of self-regulated learning. The purpose of this mixed-method study was to understand the effects of how a unique form of peer feedback – an online system of co-construction – might both trigger and sustain self-regulation in academic writing. Participants were 21 Japanese undergraduate EFL writers, 10 of whom worked as peer advisors in an online writing center. Peer advisors self-reported significantly more strategies than the comparison group. In addition, textual analysis of the feedback that peer advisors provided to writers showed evidence of strategy internalization, whereas the comparison group lacked metacognitive awareness and provided feedback of a lesser quality. Within group analysis points to how specific characteristics of peer feedback developed over time and with experience. This study considers how educators can use online feedback-on-feedback as a method for eliciting verbalizations of self-regulation.
- Journal
- Writing and Pedagogy
- Published
- 2014-09-22
- DOI
- 10.1558/wap.v6i2.399
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
The Peer Review Sep 2025The Writing Center as a Rebel Space: Stories of Tutoring and Writing with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ↗Ghada Seifeddine
-
The Peer Review Apr 2025Teresa Gebers; Wendy Pias; Rhea Soifua; Kandi Klein Timothy; Isaac K Wang
-
Praxis: A Writing Center Journal 2025“How I Speak Doesn’t Really Matter, What I Speak About Does”: BIPOC Tutor Voices on Linguistic Justice in the Writing Center ↗Chloe Ray; Erin Goldin
-
Praxis: A Writing Center Journal 2025Accidental Power: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Writing Center Interactions Between Tutors and Multilingual Tutees ↗Lisa DiMaio
-
Praxis: A Writing Center Journal 2025Sarah Kugler; Faith Thompson