Rhetorica
Jun 2010
Case Studies in Material Rhetoric: Joseph Priestley and Gilbert Austin
Abstract
This essay offers “material rhetoric” as a new addition to the usual list of categories used to describe rhetoric in the eighteenth century (neoclassical, belletristic, elocutionary, epistemological/psychological) by examining the material elements of treatises written by Joseph Priestley and Gilbert Austin. Those material elements—namely heat, passion, and impression—are tracked through Priestley and Austin’s scientific writings, thereby positioning their particular strains of material rhetoric as legacies of philosophical chemistry.
- Journal
- Rhetorica
- Published
- 2010-06-01
- DOI
- 10.1353/rht.2010.0005
- CompPile
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Rhetoric Review Jan 2018Patricia Fancher
-
Rhetoric of Health and Medicine Dec 2025Shanna Cameron
-
Composition Forum Oct 2025
-
Written Communication Jul 2025Women Scientists’ Digitally Mediated Activity, Genres and Digital Tools: A Cross-sectional Survey Across the Disciplines ↗Carmen Pérez-Llantada; Oana Maria Carciu; Rosana Villares
-
Peitho Jan 2025Tommie L. McPhetridge