Abstract
The fact that classical and early medieval allegorical personifications were exclusively female has long perplexed literary scholars and rhetoricians. Although arguments have been made about this gendering using grammatical formalism for the most part, an examination of rhetoric’s own deep structure—that is, the discursive metaphors it has always employed to talk about tropes and figures—promises to better articulate the gendered bases of the figure. Using analytical tactics drawn from Paul de Man’s discussions of prosopopeia, this essay re-examines some of the rhetorical record along with programmatic imagery from patristic writings in order to demonstrate how women themselves could serve as the “figures of figuration.”
- Journal
- Rhetorica
- Published
- 1998-03-01
- DOI
- 10.1353/rht.1998.0028
- CompPile
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Computers and Composition Jun 2026Navigating platform algorithms: Global south feminist activists’ rhetorical and composition practices in digital advocacy on social media ↗Kalpana Shrestha
-
Rhetoric Review Apr 2026Carolina Hinojosa; Kenneth Walker
-
Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric Feb 2026Danielle Bacibianco
-
College Composition and Communication Feb 2026Holly Hassel; Kate L. Pantelides
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 2026Brittany Halley; Elizabeth Velasquez