Abstract
Cicero and Quintilian were critics of oratory who knew Greek well. They both have much to say about Demosthenes and are important figures in the history of Demosthenic scholarship. Cicero discusses Demosthenes mainly in the <i>Orator</i>, which he wrote primarily as an answer to the Atticists and as a defence of his own oratory. His comments, therefore, tend to be tendentious and to reflect Ciceronian practice more than that of Demosthenes. Quintilian, on the other hand, who was a critic rather than a practicing orator and who does not have an “axe to grind,” makes many perceptive comments about Demosthenic oratory.
- Journal
- Rhetorica
- Published
- 1997-03-01
- DOI
- 10.1353/rht.1997.0019
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Rhetorica Sep 2025Daniel Markovich
-
Res Rhetorica Apr 2025„Kształcenie mówcy” współcześnie. Retoryka praktyczna i retoryka medialna w dydaktyce (uniwersyteckiej) ↗Mirosław Ryszkiewicz
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric Apr 2025Peter A. O’Connell
-
Rhetorica Jan 2025Arlene Holmes-Henderson
-
Res Rhetorica Oct 2024Gerardo Ramirez Vidal