Abstract

Abstract Metaphors abound in scientific discourse. Well-known examples include ‘the brain as a computer’ and ‘the organism as a machine’. Such metaphors, we argue, have both a theoretical and a practical aspect: they may serve as explanatory models, but also guide technological development, influence policy, reflect ideological assumptions, and reshape how we understand ourselves. These practical dimensions have prompted growing concern about the risks associated with metaphor use in science. While this concern has been widely noted, less attention has been paid to the argumentative forms such criticism may take. This article addresses that gap by reconstructing resistance to scientific metaphors—specifically computer and machine metaphors—as a form of pragmatic argumentation, in which metaphor use is challenged on the basis of its practical consequences. It further shows how such argumentation may be supported by subordinate causal arguments that appeal to the metaphor’s highlighting/hiding structure. Drawing on the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, and analyzing examples from cognitive science, philosophy, and bioethics, the article demonstrates how metaphor resistance can be understood as a reconstructable form of argumentative critique—one in which metaphors become sites of normative contestation.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
10.1007/s10503-025-09675-y
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (63) · 1 in this index

  1. Anderson, M. (2014). After phrenology: Neural reuse and the interactive brain. The MIT Press.
  2. Boldt, J. 2018. Machine metaphors and ethics in synthetic biology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy. https:/…
    Life Sciences, Society and Policy  
  3. Boyd, R. 1993. Metaphor and theory change: What is “metaphor” a metaphor for? In Metaphor and Thought, ed. A.…
  4. Camp, E. 2020. Imaginative frames in scientific inquiry. Metaphors, telling facts, and just-so stories. In Th…
  5. The idea of the brain
Show all 63 →
  1. Coyne, J.A. (2014). What scientific idea is ready for retirement? Edge. https://www.edge.org/response-detail/25381
  2. Deignan, A., E. Semino, and S.-A. Paul. 2019. Metaphors of climate science in three genres: Research articles…
    Applied Linguistics  
  3. Sensorimotor life. An enactive proposal
  4. Döring, M. 2018. Synthetic biology in the German press: How implications of metaphors shape representations o…
    Life Sciences, Society And Policy  
  5. van Eemeren, F.H. 2017. Argumentative Patterns Viewed from a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. In Prototypical …
  6. Falkner, D. 2016. Metaphors of Life: Reflections on Metaphors in the Debate on Synthetic Biology. In Ambivale…
  7. Farah, M. J. 2012. Neuroethics: The ethical, legal, and societal impact of neuroscience. Annual Review of Psy…
    Annual Review of Psychology  
  8. Feteris, E.T. (2017). The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions. In F.H.…
  9. Finsen, A. B., G. Steen, and J. H. M. Wagemans. 2019. An argumentative reconstruction of the computer metapho…
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  
  10. Finsen, A. B., G. Steen, and J. H. M. Wagemans. 2021. How do scientists criticize the computer metaphor of th…
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  
  11. Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making
  12. Frezza, G., and P. Zoccolotti. 2019. Plasticity of the neural coding metaphor: An unnoticed rhetoric in scien…
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences  
  13. Ecology of the brain: The phenomenology and biology of the embodied mind
  14. Fuchs, T. (2001). The Mechanization of the Heart: Harvey and Descartes (M. Grene, Trans). Rochester: The Univ…
  15. Garssen, B.J. 2001. Argument schemes. In Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, 81–9…
  16. Garssen, B. J. (2017). The role of pragmatic problem-solving argumentation in plenary debate
  17. Gibbs, R.W., ed. 2008. The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Griffiths, P. E. 2001. Genetic information: A metaphor in search of a theory. Philosophy of Science 68:392–412.
    Philosophy of Science  
  19. Hacker, P. (2013, June 7). Gesprek op 24. Vpro. https://www.vpro.nl/speel~WO_VPRO_365447~peter-hacker-gesprek…
  20. Haggard, P. 2011. Decision time for free will. Neuron 69 (3): 404–406.
    Neuron  
  21. Hahn, U., Bluhm, R., & Zenker, F. (2017). Causal argument. In M. R. Waldmann (Ed.), Oxford library of psychol…
  22. Hartmann, M. 2012. Against first nature: Critical theory and neuroscience. In Critical Neuroscience: A Handbo…
  23. Models and analogies in science
  24. Hornikx, J., and J. H. M. Wagemans. 2023. Argumentatieanalyse. In Tekstanalyse, ed. J. Karreman and R. van En…
  25. Pragmatic argumentation in law-making debates
  26. in the European Parliament. In F.H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical Argumentative Patterns. Exploring the Rel…
  27. Knudsen, S. 2003. Scientific metaphors going public. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (8): 1247–1263.
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  28. Knudsen, S. 2005. Communicating novel and conventional scientific metaphors: A study of the development of th…
    Public Understanding of Science  
  29. Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Scienc…
    Cognitive Science  
  30. The Scientific Imagination
  31. McLeod, C., and B. Nerlich. 2017. Synthetic biology, metaphors and responsibility. Life Sciences, Society and…
    Life Sciences, Society and Policy  
  32. Did my neurons make me do it? Philosophical and neurobiological perspectives on free will…
  33. Why trust science?
  34. Oyama, S. (2000a). The Ontogeny of Information. Duke University Press.
  35. Perelman, C. 1959. Pragmatic arguments. Philosophy 34 (128): 18–27.
    Philosophy  
  36. Reijnierse, W. G., C. Burgers, T. Krennmayr, and G. J. Steen. 2017. DMIP: A method for identifying potentiall…
    Corpus Pragmatics  
  37. Renardel de Lavalette, K., C. Andone, and G. J. Steen. 2019a. Figurative analogies and how they are resisted …
    Metaphor & the Social World  
  38. Renardel de Lavalette, K. Y., C. Andone, and G. J. Steen. 2019b. “I did not say that the Government should be…
    Journal of Language and Politics  
  39. Metaphor in discourse
  40. Snoeck Henkemans, A.F. 2017. The role of pragmatic argumentation in over-the-counter medicine advertisements.…
  41. Steen, G.J. 2013. Deliberate metaphor affords conscious metaphorical cognition. Journal of Cognitive Semiotic…
    Journal of Cognitive Semiotics
  42. Steen, G. 2017a. Attention to Metaphor: Where Embodied Cognition and Social Interaction Can Meet, But May Not…
  43. Steen, G. 2017b. Deliberate metaphor theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pra…
    Intercultural Pragmatics  
  44. Steen, G. J. (2023). Slowing metaphor down: Elaborating deliberate metaphor theory (Converging Evidence in La…
  45. The logic of metaphor – Analogous parts of possible worlds
  46. Svacinová, I. 2014. Reconstruction of metaphors in argumentation: A case study of Lincoln’s metaphor of “swa…
    Cogency
  47. We are our brains: A neurobiography of the brain, from the womb to Alzheimer’s
  48. Argumentation
  49. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective
  50. Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation
  51. van Poppel, L., and R. Pilgram. 2023. Types of resistance to metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 38 (4): 311–328.
    Metaphor and Symbol  
  52. Reconstructing argumentative discourse
  53. Handbook of argumentation theory
  54. Wackers, D. Y. M., and H. J. Plug. 2022. Countering undesirable implications of violence metaphors for cancer…
    Metaphor and Symbol  
  55. Wackers, D.Y.M., H.J. Plug, and G.J. Steen. 2021. “For crying out loud, don’t call me a warrior”: Standpoints…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  56. Wagemans, J. H. M. 2016. Analyzing Metaphor in Argumentative Discourse. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Del Lin…
    Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Del Linguaggio
  57. Xu, C., and Y. Wu. 2014. Metaphors in the perspective of argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics 62 (2): 68–76.
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  58. Qualitative discourse analysis in the social sciences