Abstract

Abstract Metaphors abound in scientific discourse. Well-known examples include ‘the brain as a computer’ and ‘the organism as a machine’. Such metaphors, we argue, have both a theoretical and a practical aspect: they may serve as explanatory models, but also guide technological development, influence policy, reflect ideological assumptions, and reshape how we understand ourselves. These practical dimensions have prompted growing concern about the risks associated with metaphor use in science. While this concern has been widely noted, less attention has been paid to the argumentative forms such criticism may take. This article addresses that gap by reconstructing resistance to scientific metaphors—specifically computer and machine metaphors—as a form of pragmatic argumentation, in which metaphor use is challenged on the basis of its practical consequences. It further shows how such argumentation may be supported by subordinate causal arguments that appeal to the metaphor’s highlighting/hiding structure. Drawing on the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, and analyzing examples from cognitive science, philosophy, and bioethics, the article demonstrates how metaphor resistance can be understood as a reconstructable form of argumentative critique—one in which metaphors become sites of normative contestation.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
10.1007/s10503-025-09675-y
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation
Also cites 43 works outside this index ↓
  1. Anderson, M. (2014). After phrenology: Neural reuse and the interactive brain. The MIT Press.
  2. Boldt, J. 2018. Machine metaphors and ethics in synthetic biology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy. https:/…
    Life Sciences, Society and Policy  
  3. Boyd, R. 1993. Metaphor and theory change: What is “metaphor” a metaphor for? In Metaphor and Thought, ed. A.…
  4. Camp, E. 2020. Imaginative frames in scientific inquiry. Metaphors, telling facts, and just-so stories. In Th…
  5. Deignan, A., E. Semino, and S.-A. Paul. 2019. Metaphors of climate science in three genres: Research articles…
    Applied Linguistics  
  6. Sensorimotor life. An enactive proposal
  7. Döring, M. 2018. Synthetic biology in the German press: How implications of metaphors shape representations o…
    Life Sciences, Society And Policy  
  8. van Eemeren, F.H. 2017. Argumentative Patterns Viewed from a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. In Prototypical …
  9. Falkner, D. 2016. Metaphors of Life: Reflections on Metaphors in the Debate on Synthetic Biology. In Ambivale…
  10. Farah, M. J. 2012. Neuroethics: The ethical, legal, and societal impact of neuroscience. Annual Review of Psy…
    Annual Review of Psychology  
  11. Feteris, E.T. (2017). The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions. In F.H.…
  12. Finsen, A. B., G. Steen, and J. H. M. Wagemans. 2019. An argumentative reconstruction of the computer metapho…
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  
  13. Finsen, A. B., G. Steen, and J. H. M. Wagemans. 2021. How do scientists criticize the computer metaphor of th…
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  
  14. Frezza, G., and P. Zoccolotti. 2019. Plasticity of the neural coding metaphor: An unnoticed rhetoric in scien…
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences  
  15. Fuchs, T. (2001). The Mechanization of the Heart: Harvey and Descartes (M. Grene, Trans). Rochester: The Univ…
  16. Garssen, B. J. (2017). The role of pragmatic problem-solving argumentation in plenary debate
  17. Gibbs, R.W., ed. 2008. The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Griffiths, P. E. 2001. Genetic information: A metaphor in search of a theory. Philosophy of Science 68:392–412.
    Philosophy of Science  
  19. Haggard, P. 2011. Decision time for free will. Neuron 69 (3): 404–406.
    Neuron  
  20. Hahn, U., Bluhm, R., & Zenker, F. (2017). Causal argument. In M. R. Waldmann (Ed.), Oxford library of psychol…
  21. Hartmann, M. 2012. Against first nature: Critical theory and neuroscience. In Critical Neuroscience: A Handbo…
  22. Knudsen, S. 2003. Scientific metaphors going public. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (8): 1247–1263.
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  23. Knudsen, S. 2005. Communicating novel and conventional scientific metaphors: A study of the development of th…
    Public Understanding of Science  
  24. Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Scienc…
    Cognitive Science  
  25. The Scientific Imagination
  26. McLeod, C., and B. Nerlich. 2017. Synthetic biology, metaphors and responsibility. Life Sciences, Society and…
    Life Sciences, Society and Policy  
  27. Did my neurons make me do it? Philosophical and neurobiological perspectives on free will…
  28. Why trust science?
  29. Oyama, S. (2000a). The Ontogeny of Information. Duke University Press.
  30. Perelman, C. 1959. Pragmatic arguments. Philosophy 34 (128): 18–27.
    Philosophy  
  31. Reijnierse, W. G., C. Burgers, T. Krennmayr, and G. J. Steen. 2017. DMIP: A method for identifying potentiall…
    Corpus Pragmatics  
  32. Renardel de Lavalette, K., C. Andone, and G. J. Steen. 2019a. Figurative analogies and how they are resisted …
    Metaphor & the Social World  
  33. Renardel de Lavalette, K. Y., C. Andone, and G. J. Steen. 2019b. “I did not say that the Government should be…
    Journal of Language and Politics  
  34. Snoeck Henkemans, A.F. 2017. The role of pragmatic argumentation in over-the-counter medicine advertisements.…
  35. Steen, G. 2017a. Attention to Metaphor: Where Embodied Cognition and Social Interaction Can Meet, But May Not…
  36. Steen, G. 2017b. Deliberate metaphor theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pra…
    Intercultural Pragmatics  
  37. Steen, G. J. (2023). Slowing metaphor down: Elaborating deliberate metaphor theory (Converging Evidence in La…
  38. Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation
  39. van Poppel, L., and R. Pilgram. 2023. Types of resistance to metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol 38 (4): 311–328.
    Metaphor and Symbol  
  40. Handbook of argumentation theory
  41. Wackers, D. Y. M., and H. J. Plug. 2022. Countering undesirable implications of violence metaphors for cancer…
    Metaphor and Symbol  
  42. Wackers, D.Y.M., H.J. Plug, and G.J. Steen. 2021. “For crying out loud, don’t call me a warrior”: Standpoints…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  43. Xu, C., and Y. Wu. 2014. Metaphors in the perspective of argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics 62 (2): 68–76.
    Journal of Pragmatics