Abstract

AbstractSocratic irony can be understood independently of the immortal heroics of Plato’s Socrates. We need a systematic account and criticism of it both as a debate-winning strategy of argumentation and teaching method. The Speaker introduces an issue pretending to be at a lower intellectual level than her co-debaters, or Participants. An Audience looks over and evaluates the results. How is it possible that the Speaker like Socrates is, consistently, in the winning position? The situation is ironic because the Participants fight from a losing position but realize it too late. Socratic irony compares with divine irony: divine irony is a subtype of Socratic irony since you lose when you challenge gods. Socratic irony is also, prima facie, a subtype of dramatic irony when the Audience knows more than the Participants on the stage.We must distinguish between the ideal and realistic elements of Socratic Irony. The very idea of Socratic irony looks idealized, or it is an ideal case, which explains the Speaker’s consistently winning position. In real life, the debate must be rigged, or the Dutch Book argument applies to the Participants, if the Speaker is so successful.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2022-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-021-09556-0
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
Also cites 25 works outside this index ↓
  1. Aikin, S. 2008. Perelmanian universal audience and the epistemic aspirations of argument. Philosophy & Rhetor…
    Philosophy & Rhetoric  
  2. Recovering bishop Berkeley.
  3. Broadie, Alexander. 1968. The practical syllogism. Analysis 29: 26–28.
    Analysis  
  4. Dynel, Marta. 2017. The irony of irony: Irony based on truthfulness. Corpus Pragmatics 1: 3–36.
    Corpus Pragmatics  
  5. Fine, Gail. 2008. Does Socrates claim to know that he knows nothing? Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 35:…
    Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy  
  6. Firth, Roderick. 1951. Ethical absolutism and the ideal observer. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 12…
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  
  7. Gettier, Edmund. 1963. Is justified true belief knowledge. Analysis 23: 121–123.
    Analysis  
  8. Goldie, Peter, “Dramatic irony, narrative, and the external perspective.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Suppl…
  9. Gottlieb, Paula. 1992. The complexity of Socratic irony: A note on professor Vlastos’ account. Classical Quar…
    Classical Quarterly  
  10. The blackwell guide to Aristotle's nicomachean ethics
  11. Lewis, David. 1979. Attitudes de dicto and de se. Philosophical Review 88: 513–543.
    Philosophical Review  
  12. Magrini, James Michael. 2014. Dialectic and dialogue in Plato: Refuting the model of Socrates-as-teacher in t…
    Educational Philosophy and Theory  
  13. Miller, Leonard G. 1957. Descartes, mathematics, and God. Philosophical Review 66: 451–465.
    Philosophical Review  
  14. Mintz, Avi I. 2014. Why did Socrates deny that he was a teacher? Locating Socrates among the new educators an…
    Educational Philosophy and Theory  
  15. Piering, Julie. 2010. Irony and shame in Socratic ethics. International Philosophical Quarterly 50: 473–488.
    International Philosophical Quarterly  
  16. Potter, Garry. 2010. Power and knowledge. A dialectical contradiction. Journal of Critical Realism 9: 133–154.
    Journal of Critical Realism  
  17. Aporetics: Rational deliberation in the face of inconsistency
  18. Contingency, irony, and solidarity
  19. Solomon, Robert C. 2003. On fate and fatalism. Philosophy East and West 53: 435–454.
    Philosophy East and West  
  20. Stone, Mark A. 2012. Denying the antecedent: Its effective use in argumentation. Informal Logic 32: 327–356.
    Informal Logic  
  21. Rhetorical argumentation: Principles of theory and practice
  22. Vasiliou, Iakovos. 1999. Conditional irony in the Socratic dialogues. Classical Quarterly 49: 456–472.
    Classical Quarterly  
  23. Aiming at virtue in plato
  24. Vlastos, Gregory. 1987. Socratic irony. Classical Quarterly 37: 79–96.
    Classical Quarterly  
  25. Zyskind, Harold, and R. Sternfeld. 1976. Plato’s Meno 89 C: Virtue is knowledge. A hypothesis? Phronesis 21: …
    Phronesis