No Place for Compromise: Resisting the Shift to Negotiation

David Godden Michigan State University ; John Casey Northeastern Illinois University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2020-12-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-020-09517-z
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. Alschuler, A. 1968. The prosecutor’s role in plea bargaining. University of Chicago Law Review 36: 50–112.
    University of Chicago Law Review  
  2. Godden, D. 2010. The importance of belief in argumentation: Belief, commitment and the effective resolution o…
    Synthese  
  3. Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies, Argumentation Library
  4. Paglieri, F., and C. Castelfranchi. 2010. Why argue? Towards a cost–benefit analysis of argumentation. Argume…
    Argument and Computation  
  5. Schulhofer, S. 1992. Plea bargaining as disaster. The Yale Law Journal 101 (8): 1979–2009.
    The Yale Law Journal  
  6. Stevens, K. 2019. The roles we make others take: Thoughts on the ethics of arguing. Topoi 38 (4): 693–709.
    Topoi  
  7. van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical Model f…
  8. van Laar, J.A., and E.C.W. Krabbe. 2019a. Criticism and justification of negotiated compromises: The 2015 Par…
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  
  9. The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument
  10. Argumentation schemes
  11. Weinstock, D. 2013. On the possibility of principled moral compromise. Critical Review of International Socia…
    Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy  
  12. Wright, R., and M. Miller. 2002. The screening/bargaining tradeoff. Stanford Law Review 55 (1): 29–118.
    Stanford Law Review