Conversational Integrity: Argument, Commitment, and Compromise

Jan Albert van Laar

doi:10.5325/philrhet.57.3.0306

Philosophy & Rhetoric Dec 2024 Open Access

Conversational Integrity: Argument, Commitment, and Compromise

Jan Albert van Laar University of Groningen

Abstract

ABSTRACT What does it mean to have and maintain a position of integrity when reasoning and arguing in a series of different kinds of dialogues? When participants in a critical discussion fail to reach an agreement on the rational merits of their response to a practical problem, they may remain hopeful of reaching a compromise solution in a negotiation dialogue that they perceive as the most rational one that is socially feasible. This article considers whether one’s commitments can be managed in such a way as to preserve the integrity of one’s position across these dialogues. After all, in compromise formation practical concerns may interfere with epistemic ambitions, and one may have to trade away what was deemed essential to one’s position in critical discussion. Conversational integrity is maintained when one’s position is sufficiently transparent, stable, inclusive, and authentic. These characteristics may provide guidance for those involved in political dealmaking.

Journal: Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published: 2024-12-02
DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.57.3.0306
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: OA PDF Green
Topics: editorial matter
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (21) · 4 in this index

(2021)

Epistemic Autonomy
(1999)

Liberalism and Pluralism: Towards a Politics of Compromise
(1990)

Splitting the Difference: Compromise and Integrity in Ethics and Politics
(2016)

“Compromise Despite Conviction: Curbing Integrity’s Moral Dangers.”

Journal of Value Inquiry ↗
(1995)

“Standing for Something.”

Journal of Philosophy ↗

Show all 21 →

(2023)

“Negotiation as Practical Argumentation.”

Argumentation
Christmann et al. (2000)

Argumentational Integrity: A Training Program for Dealing with Unfair Argumenta…

Argumentation
(2010)

Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory…
Godden et al. (2020)

No Place for Compromise: Resisting the Shift to Negotiation

Argumentation
(1970)

Fallacies
(2001)

“The Problem of Retraction in Critical Discussion.”

Synthese ↗
Laar et al. (2018)

Splitting a Difference of Opinion: The Shift to Negotiation

Argumentation
Laar et al. (2018)

The Role of Argument in Negotiation

Argumentation
(2019)

“Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises: The 2015 Paris Agreement in Dutch…

Journal of Argumentation in Context ↗
(2019)

“Pressure and Argumentation in Public Controversies.”

Informal Logic ↗
(2010)

“The Role of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy.”

Journal of Political Philosophy ↗
(2018)

The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy
(1998)

The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument
(1995)

Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning
(1973)

“The Problem of Dirty Hands.”

Philosophy & Public Affairs
de Witt Wijn, Philip, and RosaUijtewaal. 2023. “Landbouwakkoord Opnieuw ‘Weken’ Vertraagd.”NRC, 18May. https:…

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Conversational Integrity: Argument, Commitment, and Compromise

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

References (21) · 4 in this index

Related Articles