Argumentation Jun 2020 Open Access

Argumentative Use and Strategic Function of the Expression ‘Not for Nothing’

Henrike Jansen Leiden University ; Francisca Snoeck Henkemans University of Amsterdam

Abstract

AbstractIn English discourse one can find cases of the expression ‘not for nothing’ being used in argumentation. The expression can occur both in the argument and in the standpoint. In this chapter we analyse the argumentative and rhetorical aspects of ‘not for nothing’ by regarding this expression as a presentational device for strategic manoeuvring. We investigate under which conditions the proposition containing the expression ‘not for nothing’ functions as a standpoint, an argument or neither of these elements. It is also examined which type of standpoint (descriptive, evaluative or prescriptive) and which types of argument scheme (symptomatic, causal or comparison) the expression typically co-occurs with. In doing so we aim to develop a better understanding of the role and effects of ‘not for nothing’ when used in argumentation. Finally, we show that the strategic potential of ‘not for nothing’ lies in its suggestion that sufficient support has been provided while this support has in fact been left implicit.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2020-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-019-09509-8
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Jansen (2017)
    “You Think That Says a Lot, but Really it Says Nothing”: An Argumentative and L…
    Argumentation
  2. Henkemans (2009)
    Manoeuvring Strategically with Praeteritio
    Argumentation
  3. Zarefsky (2007)
    Strategic Maneuvering through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialecti…
    Argumentation
  4. Eemeren et al. (2000)
    Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework
    Argumentation
Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. FH van Eemeren (2010)
    Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse (argumentation in context 2)
     ↗
  2. FH van Eemeren (1999)
    van Eemeren, F.H., and P. Houtlosser. 1999a. Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Stud…
    Discourse Studies  ↗
  3. FH van Eemeren (2002)
    Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis
     ↗
  4. FH van Eemeren (2016)
    Argumentation. Analysis, evaluation, presentation
     ↗
  5. T van Haaften (2019)
    van Haaften, T. 2019. Argumentative strategies and stylistic devices. Informal Logic 39 (4): 301–328.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  6. Zarefsky, D. 2014. Rhetorical perspectives on argumentation. Selected essays by David Zarefsky. (Argumentatio…
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Res Rhetorica Apr 2026
    Logos in ancient Greek discourse on rhetoric: An overview ↗
    Arkadiusz Sokolnicki
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  2. Poroi Feb 2026
    Using Stasis Theory as a Heuristic for Examining Epistemological Dilemmas in a Post-Truth Landscape ↗
    Bruce Bowles
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  3. Argumentation Feb 2026
    When Emmanuel Macron Goes Social: Using Social Media Influencers as a Rhetorical Strategy ↗
    Keren Sadoun-Kerber
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument collaborative writing social media affect and writing
  4. Rhetorica Jan 2026
    The Daimonion of Isocrates: Anti-Socratic Polemics and the Power of Politikoi Logoi in the Philippos ↗
    Tobias Hirsch
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  5. Argumentation Oct 2025
    Practical Argumentation and Rhetorical Structure Theory ↗
    Nancy Green
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument assessment