Strategic Maneuvering through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialectic and Rhetoric — Pinakes

Argumentation Jul 2007

Strategic Maneuvering through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialectic and Rhetoric

David Zarefsky Northwestern University

Journal: Argumentation
Published: 2007-07-09
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-007-9030-6
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: rhetorical criticism
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (10)

Zenker et al. (2024)

Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation

Argumentation
Pruś (2021)

How Can Modifications of Meaning Influence Argumentation? The Concept and Typol…

Argumentation
Jansen et al. (2020)

Argumentative Use and Strategic Function of the Expression ‘Not for Nothing’

Argumentation
Jansen (2017)

“You Think That Says a Lot, but Really it Says Nothing”: An Argumentative and L…

Argumentation
Eemeren (2013)

In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of…

Argumentation

Show all 10 →

Mitchell (2010)

Higher-Order Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentation

Argumentation
Walton et al. (2009)

Reasoning from Classifications and Definitions

Argumentation
Tonnard (2008)

Comments on ‘Strategic Maneuvering in Political Argumentation’

Argumentation
Zarefsky (2008)

Strategic Maneuvering in Political Argumentation

Argumentation
Kienpointner (2007)

Revolutionary Rhetoric: Georg Büchner’s “Der Hessische Landbote” (1834) – A Cas…

Argumentation

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 1 work outside this index ↓

F. H. Eemeren van (2002)

Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 54 View in citation network → Build reading path →