Argumentation Sep 2019

Reconstructing Complex Pro/Con Argumentation

André Juthe
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2019-09-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-018-9467-9
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
argument
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (90) · 8 in this index

  1. Adler (2013)
    Are Conductive Arguments Possible?
    Argumentation
  2. D Allen (1990)
    Allen, D. 1990. Trudy Govier’s problems in argument analysis and evaluation. Informal Logic 12(1): 43–62.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  3. Kurt Baier (1958)
    Moral point of view: A rational basis of ethics
  4. S Bailin (2015)
    Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory
     ↗
  5. EM Barth (2010)
    From axiom to dialogue: A philosophical study of logics and argumentation
     ↗
Show all 90 →
  1. G Bassham (2003)
    Proceedings of the fifth conference of the international society for the study of argumentation
  2. M Battersby (2011)
    Conductive argument: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning
  3. Bermejo-Luque, Lilian, “Commentary on Yun Xie’s “Arguing Conductively or Arguing Strategically?”“. 2016. OSSA…
  4. G Björnsson (1994)
    Argumentationsanalys
  5. G Björnsson (2010)
    Argumentationsanalys: färdigheter för kritiskt tänkande
  6. JA Blair (2011)
    Conductive argument: An overlooked type of Defeasible reasoning
  7. Blair, A.J. 2011b. A critical examination and development of Wellman’s theory of conductive argument. OSSA Co…
  8. JA Blair (2012)
    Groundwork in the theory of argumentation selected papers of J. Anthony Blair
     ↗
  9. Blair (2016)
    A Defense of Conduction: A Reply to Adler
    Argumentation
  10. (2011)
    Conductive argument: an overlooked type of defeasible reasoning
  11. David Botting (2012)
    Botting, David. 2012. Wellman’s typology. Study in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 28(41): 23–43.
    Study in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
  12. DA Conway (1991)
    On the distinction between convergent and linked arguments
  13. MA Finocchiaro (2005)
    Arguments about arguments systematic, critical, and historical essays in logical theory
     ↗
  14. M Finocchiaro (2011)
    Conductive argument: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning
  15. M Finocchiaro (2012)
    Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies
     ↗
  16. T Fischer (2011)
    Conductive argument: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning
  17. T Fischer (2012)
    Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies
     ↗
  18. Freeman (2001)
    Argument Structure and Disciplinary Perspective
    Argumentation
  19. JB Freeman (2011)
    Argument structure: Representation and theory
     ↗
  20. GC Goddu (2003)
    Goddu, G.C. 2003a. Against the “Ordinary Summing” test for convergence. Informal Logic 23(3): 215–236.
    Informal Logic
  21. Goddu, G.C. 2003b. Commentary on Yanal. In OSSA Conference Archive. Paper 102, 1–6. University of Windsor Sch…
  22. GC Goddu (2007)
    Goddu, G.C. 2007. Walton on argument structure. Informal Logic 27(1): 5–25.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  23. GC Goddu (2009)
    Pondering on problems of argumentation: Twenty essays on theoretical issues
     ↗
  24. Goorden, D. 2011. Conductive arguments and the “inference to the best explanation”. In Argumentation: Cogniti…
  25. T Govier (1979)
    Govier, T. 1979. Wellmans challenge and response. Informal Logic Newsletter 2(2): 2–4.
    Informal Logic Newsletter
  26. T Govier (1980)
    Govier, T. 1980. Assessing arguments: What range of standards? Informal Logic 3(1): 1–2.
    Informal Logic
  27. Govier, T. 1984. More on deductive and inductive arguments. Informal Logic, 2(3): 7–8. http://www.phaenex.uwi…
  28. T Govier (1987)
    Proceedings of the first international conference on argumentation
  29. T Govier (2000)
    Govier, T. 2000. Critical review of Johnson’s Manifest rationality. Informal Logic 20(3): 281–290.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  30. T Govier (2010)
    A practical study of argument
  31. T Govier (2011)
    Conductive argument: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning
  32. Govier, T. 2011b. More on counter-considerations. In Argumentation: cognition and community. Proceedings of t…
  33. R Grootendorst (2004)
    A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach
  34. HV Hansen (2011)
    Conductive argument: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning
  35. Hitchcock, D. 1994. Validity in conductive arguments. In New essays in informal logic, ed. Johnson and Blair …
  36. Hitchcock, D. 2007. The concept of argument, and informal logic. In Philosophy of logic, ed. D. Jacquette, vo…
  37. D Hitchcock (2013)
    Hitchcock, D. 2013. Appeal to considerations. Informal Logic 33(2): 195–237.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  38. D Hitchcock (2015)
    Hitchcock, D. 2015a. Freeman’ s syntactic criterion for linkage. Informal Logic 35(1): 1–31.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  39. D Hitchcock (2015)
    Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory
     ↗
  40. D Hitchcock (2017)
    On reasoning and argument: essays in informal logic and on critical thinking
     ↗
  41. R Jin (2011)
    Conductive argument: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning
  42. RH Johnson (2011)
    Conductive argument: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning
  43. A Juthe (2015)
    Juthe, A. 2015. Analogical argument schemes and complex argumentation. Informal Logic 35(3): 378–445.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  44. C Kock (2011)
    Conductive argument: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning
  45. K Lorenz (2010)
    Logic, language, and method: On polarities in human experience: Philosophical papers
     ↗
  46. Naess, A. 1966. Communication and argument: Elements of applied semantics. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. London…
  47. A Naess (2005)
    The selected works of Arne Naess
  48. Peldszus, A., M. Stede, and C. Cardie. 2015. Towards detecting counter-considerations in text. In Proceedings…
  49. Pinto, R.C. 2001. Argument schemes and the evaluation of presumptive reasoning. In Argument, inference and di…
     ↗
  50. Pinto, R.C. 2009. Argumentation and the force of reasons. Informal Logic, 29(3): 268–295. https://windsor.sch…
  51. RC Pinto (2011)
    Conductive argument: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning
  52. RC Pinto (1993)
    Reasoning: A practical guide
  53. JL Pollock (1995)
    Cognitive carpentry: A blueprint for how to build a person
     ↗
  54. K Possin (2012)
    Possin, K. 2012. The myth of conductive arguments. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27(3): 29–33.
    Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines
  55. K Possin (2016)
    Possin, K. 2016. Conductive arguments: Why is this still a thing? Informal Logic 36(4): 563–593.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  56. H Rückert (2001)
    New perspectives in dialogical logic
  57. Snoeck Henkemans, A.F. 1997. Analysing complex Argumentation: The reconstruction of multiple and coordinative…
  58. Henkemans (2000)
    State-of-the-Art: The Structure of Argumentation
    Argumentation
  59. Henkemans (2003)
    Complex Argumentation in a Critical Discussion
    Argumentation
  60. SN Thomas (1986)
    Practical reasoning in natural language
  61. Thomas, Stephen N. 1977, 1981, 1986, 1997. Practical reasoning in natural language (1st through 4th editions)…
  62. FH Eemeren van (2010)
    Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory…
     ↗
  63. van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model f…
     ↗
  64. FH Eemeren van (1992)
    Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective
  65. FH Eemeren van (2002)
    Argumentation: analysis, evaluation, presentation
     ↗
  66. FH Eemeren van (2014)
    Handbook of argumentation theory
     ↗
  67. JA Laar van (2014)
    van Laar, J.A. 2014. Arguments that take Counter-considerations into Account. Informal Logic 34(3): 240–275.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  68. Vorobej, M. 1994. The TRUE test of linkage. Informal Logic, 16(3): 147–157. http://hrgpapers.uwindsor.ca/ojs/…
  69. Vorobej, M. 1995a. Hybrid arguments. Informal Logic, 17(2): 289–296. http://hrgpapers.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/i…
  70. Vorobej (1995)
    Linked arguments and the validity requirement
    Argumentation
  71. M Vorobej (2009)
    A theory of argument
  72. DN Walton (1985)
    Walton, D.N. 1985. New directions in the logic of dialogue. Synthese 63(3): 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/…
    Synthese  ↗
  73. DN Walton (1996)
    Argument structure: A pragmatic theory
     ↗
  74. Douglas Walton (1996)
    Argument structure: A pragmatic theory
     ↗
  75. D Walton (2006)
    Fundamentals of critical argumentation (critical reasoning and argumentation)
  76. D Walton (2011)
    Ethical deliberation, conductive argument: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning
  77. C Wellman (1971)
    Challenge and response: Justification in ethics
  78. Wohlrapp (1998)
    A New Light on Non-deductive Argumentation Schemes
    Argumentation
  79. H Wohlrapp (2011)
    Conductive arguments: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning
  80. Y Xie (2017)
    Xie, Y. 2017. Conductive argument as a mode of strategic maneuvering. Informal Logic 37(1): 2–22.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  81. RJ Yanal (1991)
    Yanal, R.J. 1991. Dependent and independent reasons. Informal Logic 13(3): 137–144.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  82. Yanal, R.J. 2003. Linked and convergent reasons—Again. In OSSA Conference Archive. Paper 101, 1–7. University…
  83. Yu et al. (2018)
    Peirce Knew Why Abduction Isn’t IBE—A Scheme and Critical Questions for Abducti…
    Argumentation
  84. Zenker, F. 2007. Complexity without insight: Real Ceteris paribus clauses in assessing conductive argumentati…
  85. F Zenker (2011)
    Conductive argument: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Argumentation Apr 2026
    A Normative Pragmatic Inquiry into the Volatility of Norms in Argumentation ↗
    Sally Jackson
    discourse analysis argument qualitative research public rhetoric
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Apr 2026
    Book Review: Environmental Preservation and the Grey Cliffs Conflict: Negotiating Common Narratives, Values, and Ethos PickeringK. (2024). Environmental Preservation and the Grey Cliffs Conflict: Negotiating Common Narratives, Values, and Ethos. Utah State University Press, 268 pp. ↗
    Mia Twomey
    argument book reviews
  3. Res Rhetorica Apr 2026
    Logos in ancient Greek discourse on rhetoric: An overview ↗
    Arkadiusz Sokolnicki
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  4. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    Associations of adolescents’ argumentative writing scores and growth when evaluated by different human raters and artificial intelligence models ↗
    Deborah K. Reed; Sterett Mercer
    argument artificial intelligence
  5. Rhetoric of Health and Medicine Apr 2026
    Psyche or Soma?: An Analysis of the Medical Debates Over the Diagnosis and Treatment of “Transsexualism” ↗
    Samantha Rippetoe
    rhetorical criticism argument archival research