A Defense of Conduction: A Reply to Adler — Pinakes

Argumentation May 2016

A Defense of Conduction: A Reply to Adler

J. Anthony Blair University of Windsor

Journal: Argumentation
Published: 2016-05-01
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-015-9368-0
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: editorial matter
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Juthe (2019)

Reconstructing Complex Pro/Con Argumentation

Argumentation

Cites in this index (1)

Adler (2013)

Are Conductive Arguments Possible?

Argumentation

Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓

Bailin, S., and M. Battersby. 2015. Conductive argumentation, degrees of confidence, and the communication of…

↗
T Govier (1987)

Problems in argument analysis and evaluation

↗
JL Pollock (1987)

Pollock, J.L. 1987. Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science 11: 481–518.

Cognitive Science ↗

CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network → Build reading path →