Abstract

Whether abduction is treated as an argument or as an inference, the mainstream view presupposes a tight connection between abduction and inference to the best explanation (IBE). This paper critically evaluates this link and supports a narrower view on abduction. Our main thesis is that merely the hypothesis-generative aspect, but not the evaluative aspect, is properly abductive in the sense introduced by C. S. Peirce. We show why equating abduction with IBE (or understanding them as inseparable parts) unnecessarily complicates argument evaluation by levelling the status of abduction as a third reasoning mode (besides deduction and induction). We also propose a scheme for abductive argument along with critical questions, and suggest retaining abduction alongside IBE as related but distinct categories.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2018-12-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-017-9443-9
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation

References (49) · 6 in this index

  1. Abductive Reasoning. Logical Investigations into Discovery and Explanation (Syntheses Library)
  2. Anderson, D.R. 1986. The evolution of Peirce’s concept of abduction. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce So…
    Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Argumentation
Show all 49 →
  1. Bex, F., and B. Verheij. 2013. Legal stories and the process of proof. Artificial Intelligence and Law 21: 253–278.
    Artificial Intelligence and Law  
  2. Burks, A.W. 1946. Peirce’s theory of abduction. Philosophy of Science 13: 301–306.
    Philosophy of Science  
  3. Argumentation
  4. Campos, D.G. 2011. On the distinction between Peirce’s abduction and Lipton’s inference to the best explanati…
    Synthese  
  5. Douven, I. 2011. Abduction. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2016 ed, ed. E.N. Zalta. http:…
  6. Argumentation
  7. Frankfurt, H.G. 1958. Peirce’s notion of abduction. The Journal of Philosophy 55: 593–597.
    The Journal of Philosophy  
  8. Goldman, A., and Beddor, B. 2016. Reliabilist epistemology. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winte…
  9. Goodnight, T. 1993. Legitimation inference: An additional component for the Toulmin model. Informal Logic 15: 1–15.
    Informal Logic  
  10. Anyone Who has a View. Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation
  11. Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics
  12. Hintikka, J. 1998. What is abduction? The fundamental problem of contemporary epistemology. Transactions of t…
    Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society
  13. Harman, G. 1965. The inference to the best explanation. Journal of Philosophy 74: 88–95.
    Journal of Philosophy
  14. Abductive Inference: Computation, Philosophy, Technology
  15. Inference to the Best Explanation
  16. Abduction, Reason and Science. Processes of Discovery and Explanation
  17. Oddie, G. 2016. Truthlikeness. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2016 ed, ed. E.N. Zalta. h…
  18. Niiniluoto, I. 1999. Defending abduction. Philosophy of Science 66: S436–S451.
    Philosophy of Science  
  19. Peirce, C.S. 1931–1958. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 1–8, eds. P. Weiss, C. Hartshorne, &…
  20. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. 1969. The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation (trans: Wilkinson, J…
  21. Pollock, J.L. 1987. Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science 11: 481–518.
    Cognitive Science  
  22. Preyer, G., and D. Mans. 1999. On contemporary developments in the theory of argumentation. Protosociology 13…
    Protosociology  
  23. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference
  24. Schurz, G. 2008. Patterns of abduction. Synthese 164: 201–234.
    Synthese  
  25. Shelley, C.P. 1996. Visual abductive reasoning in archaeology. Philosophy of Science 63: 278–301.
    Philosophy of Science  
  26. The Laws of Belief: Ranking Functions and Their Applications
  27. Conceptual revolutions
  28. How scientists explain disease
  29. Coherence in thought and action
  30. Inductive Reasoning: Experimental, Developmental and Computational Approaches
  31. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
  32. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach
  33. Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory…
  34. Handbook of Argumentation Theory
  35. Argumentation
  36. Verheij, B. 2003. Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: An approach to legal logic. Artificia…
    Artificial Intelligence and Law  
  37. Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation
  38. Virtues of Argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario…
  39. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning
  40. Walton, D. 2001. Abductive, presumptive and plausible arguments. Informal Logic 21: 141–169.
    Informal Logic
  41. Argumentation Schemes
  42. Williamson, J. 2003. Review: Abduction, reason, and science—Processes of discovery and explanation. British J…
    British Journal for the Philosophy of Science  
  43. Errors of Reasoning: Naturalizing the Logic of Inference
  44. Conductive Argument: An Overlooked Type of Defeasible Reasoning