Abstract

The aim of the paper is to explore the interrelation between persuasion tactics and properties of speech acts. We investigate two types of arguments ad: ad hominem and ad baculum. We show that with both of these tactics, the structures that play a key role are not inferential, but rather ethotic, i.e., related to the speaker’s character and trust. We use the concepts of illocutionary force and constitutive conditions related to the character or status of the speaker in order to explain the dynamics of these two techniques. In keeping with the research focus of the Polish School of Argumentation, we examine how the pragmatic and rhetorical aspects of the force of ad hominem and ad baculum arguments exploit trust in the speaker’s status to influence the audience’s cognition.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2014-08-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-014-9322-6
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

References (28) · 4 in this index

  1. Aristotle. 1991. Rhetoric (translated by G. A. Kennedy). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. How to do things with words
  3. Argumentation
  4. Budzynska, K. 2010. Argument analysis: Components of interpersonal argumentation. In: Frontiers in Artificial…
  5. Budzynska, K. 2013. Circularity in ethotic structures. Synthese 190(15): 3185–3207. doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0…
Show all 28 →
  1. Budzynska, K., and C. Reed. 2011. Whence inference? University of Dundee Technical Report.
  2. Budzynska, K., and C. Reed. 2012. The structure of ad hominem dialogues. In: Frontiers in Artificial Intellig…
  3. Proximization: The pragmatics of symbolic distance crossing
  4. Debowska, K. 2007. The pragma-dialectical view of relatively ’naturalistic’ discussions in Polish and English…
  5. Argumentation
  6. Argumentation
  7. Speech act assignment
  8. Goodwin, J. 2014. Conceptions of speech acts in the theory and practice of argumentation: A case study of a d…
  9. Argumentation
  10. Lewis, D. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359.
    Journal of Philosophical Logic  
  11. Reed, C., and M. Koszowy. 2011. The development of argument and computation and its roots in the Lvov–Warsaw …
  12. Sbisà, M. 2002. Speech acts in context. Language and Communication 22: 421–436.
    Language and Communication  
  13. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language
  14. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts
  15. Making the social world: The structure of human civilzation
  16. Snoeck-Henkemans, A.F. 2014. Speech act theory and the study of argumentation. In Studies in Logic, Grammar a…
  17. Strawson, P. 1964. Convention and intention in speech acts. Philosophical Review 73: 439–460.
    Philosophical Review  
  18. Ad hominem arguments
  19. Scare tactics: Arguments that appeal to fear and threats
  20. Informal logic: A pragmatic approach
  21. Witek, M. 2013a. How to establish authority with words. In Theory of imperatives from different points of vie…
  22. Witek, M. 2013b. Three approaches to the study of speech acts. Dialogue and Universalism 23(1): 129–142.
    Dialogue and Universalism  
  23. Załęska, M. 2011. Ad hominem in the criticisms of expert argumentation. In Proceedings of the 7th conference …