Argumentation
Nov 1989
Open Access
Speech act conditions as tools for reconstructing argumentative discourse
Frans H. van Eemeren
University of Amsterdam
;
Rob Grootendorst
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Journal
Argumentation
Published
1989-11-01
DOI
10.1007/bf00182604
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF
Green
Topics
discourse analysis
Export
BibTeX
RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index
(2)
Visser (2017)
Speech Acts in a Dialogue Game Formalisation of Critical Discussion
Argumentation
Budzynska et al. (2014)
Non-Inferential Aspects of Ad Hominem and Ad Baculum
Argumentation
References
(0)
No references on file for this article.
CrossRef global citation count: 11
View in citation network →
Build reading path →
Related Articles
Computers and Composition
Jun 2026
Historicizing critical discourse about emergent tools and technologies across 40 years of Computers and Composition
↗
Meghan Velez; Kara Taczak; Matthew D. Bryan
discourse analysis
digital rhetoric
Argumentation
May 2026
Do You Want to Build a Straw Man?: Evidentiary and Argumentative Modes of the Straw Man Fallacy
↗
Eugen Octav Popa
discourse analysis
assessment
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
May 2026
Communicating Diversity and Inclusion in LinkedIn Job Advertisements
↗
Rashid Ashraf; Said Badreddine; Mohamed I. Albeshr; Hamsa Al Ammari; Malik Muhammad Sheheryar Khan; Pranav Naithani
discourse analysis
professional writing
race and writing
Written Communication
May 2026
Untold Pushbacks: Synthesizing Discourse-Based and Phenomenological Interviewing to Explore Tacit Knowledges of Black and Latinx Writers
↗
Ray Rosas
discourse analysis
Argumentation
Apr 2026
Jennifer Schumann, The pragmatics of straw man fallacies: An experimental approach, Cham, Springer 2025, 273 p
↗
Jos Hornikx
discourse analysis