Argumentation Jun 2017 Open Access

Speech Acts in a Dialogue Game Formalisation of Critical Discussion

Jacky Visser University of Amsterdam

Abstract

In this paper a dialogue game for critical discussion is developed. The dialogue game is a formalisation of the ideal discussion model that is central to the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. The formalisation is intended as a preparatory step to facilitate the development of computational tools to support the pragma-dialectical study of argumentation. An important dimension of the pragma-dialectical discussion model is the role played by speech acts. The central issue addressed in this paper is how the speech act perspective can be accommodated in the formalisation as a dialogue game. The starting point is an existing ‘basic’ dialogue game for critical discussion, in which speech acts are not addressed. The speech act perspective is introduced into the dialogue game by changing the rules that govern the moves that can be made and the commitments that these result in, while the rules for the beginning, for the end, and for the structure of the dialogue game remain unchanged. The revision of the move rules is based on the distribution of speech acts in the pragma-dialectical discussion model. The revision of the commitment rules is based on the felicity conditions that are associated with those speech acts.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2017-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-016-9404-8
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
discourse analysis revision argument
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Yaskorska-Shah (2021)
    Managing the Complexity of Dialogues in Context: A Data-Driven Discovery Method…
    Argumentation
  2. Visser (2017)
    Speech Acts in a Dialogue Game Formalisation of Critical Discussion
    Argumentation

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Visser (2017)
    Speech Acts in a Dialogue Game Formalisation of Critical Discussion
    Argumentation
  2. Eemeren et al. (1989)
    Speech act conditions as tools for reconstructing argumentative discourse
    Argumentation
Also cites 24 works outside this index ↓
  1. EM Barth (1982)
    From axiom to dialogue: A philosophical study of logics and argumentation
     ↗
  2. F Bex (2013)
    Bex, F., J. Lawrence, M. Snaith, and C.A. Reed. 2013. Implementing the Argument Web. Communications of the AC…
    Communications of the ACM  ↗
  3. PM Dung (1995)
    Dung, P.M. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic …
    Artificial Intelligence  ↗
  4. CL Hamblin (1971)
    Hamblin, C.L. 1971. Mathematical models of dialogue. Theoria 37: 130–155.
    Theoria  ↗
  5. ECW Krabbe (2011)
    Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics
     ↗
  6. SC Levinson (1983)
    Pragmatics
     ↗
  7. M Lippi (2016)
    Lippi, M., and P. Torroni. 2016. Argumentation mining: State of the art and emerging trends. ACM Transactions…
    ACM Transactions on Internet Technology  ↗
  8. JD Mackenzie (1979)
    Mackenzie, J.D. 1979. Question-begging in non-cumulative systems. Journal of philosophical logic 8: 117–133.
    Journal of philosophical logic  ↗
  9. P McBurney (2009)
    Argumentation in artificial intelligence
     ↗
  10. J Pollock (1987)
    Pollock, J. 1987. Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science 11: 481–518.
    Cognitive Science  ↗
  11. H Prakken (2009)
    Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence
     ↗
  12. I Rahwan (2009)
    Argumentation in artificial intelligence
     ↗
  13. O Scheuer (2010)
    Scheuer, O., F. Loll, N. Pinkwart, and B.M. McLaren. 2010. Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the …
    International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning  ↗
  14. JR Searle (1969)
    Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language
     ↗
  15. P Tolchinsky (2008)
    Agent technology and e-health
     ↗
  16. FH Eemeren van (2010)
    Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory…
     ↗
  17. van Eemeren, F.H. 2015a. Bingo! Promising developments in argumentation theory. In Proceedings of the 8th con…
     ↗
  18. FH Eemeren van (2015)
    Reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentative discourse: Fifty contributions to the d…
     ↗
  19. FH Eemeren van (1984)
    Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discuss…
     ↗
  20. FH Eemeren van (2007)
    Argumentative indicators in discourse. A pragma-dialectical study
     ↗
  21. FH Eemeren van (2014)
    Handbook of argumentation theory
     ↗
  22. B Verheij (2005)
    Virtual arguments: On the design of argument assistants for lawyers and other arguers
     ↗
  23. JC Visser (2015)
    Visser, J.C. 2015b. Het formaliseren van kritische discussie ter voorbereiding op geautomatiseerde argumentat…
    Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing  ↗
  24. J Woods (1978)
    Woods, J., and D.N. Walton. 1978. Arresting circles in formal dialogues. Journal of philosophical logic 7: 73–90.
    Journal of philosophical logic  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric Oct 2025
    The Intellectual and Cultural Origins of Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s New Rhetoric Project: Commentaries on and Translations of Seven Foundational Articles, 1933–1958 ↗
    Christopher W. Tindale
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis revision argument collaborative writing editorial matter
  2. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Mar 2022
    Andrew Jackson: A Rhetorical Portrayal of Presidential Leadership ↗
    Jacob Justice
    rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis revision argument multimodality race and writing public rhetoric editorial matter
  3. Rhetorica Apr 2018
    Demosthenes’ On the Crown: Rhetorical Perspectives ed. by James J. Murphy ↗
    Michael Gagarin
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis revision argument qualitative research public rhetoric
  4. Advances in the History of Rhetoric Sep 2016
    The Rhetoric of Plato’s <i>Republic</i> : Democracy and the Philosophical Problem of Persuasion ↗
    Arabella Lyon
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis cultural rhetorics writing pedagogy revision argument gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric
  5. Rhetorica Sep 2015
    Deep Rhetoric: Philosophy, Reason, Violence, Justice, Wisdom by James Crosswhite ↗
    Gerard A. Hauser
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis revision argument public rhetoric