Applying Recent Argumentation Methods to Some Ancient Examples of Plausible Reasoning

Douglas Walton University of Windsor ; Christopher W. Tindale University of Windsor ; Thomas F. Gordon Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2014-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-013-9306-y
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓
  1. Allen, J. 1994. Academic probabilism and stoic epistemology. Classical Quarterly 44: 85–113.
    Classical Quarterly  
  2. Analysis of evidence
  3. Bett, R. 1990. Carneades’ distinction between assent and approval. Monist 73: 3–20.
    Monist  
  4. Bex, F., H. Prakken, C. Reed, and D. Walton. 2003. Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence. Argu…
    Argument Schemes and Generalizations, Artificial Intelligence & Law  
  5. Argumentation and artificial intelligence
  6. Gordon, T.F., and D. Walton. 2012. A Carneades reconstruction of Popov v Hayashi. Artificial Intelligence and…
    Artificial Intelligence and Law  
  7. Gordon, T.F., H. Prakken, and D. Walton. 2007. The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificia…
    Artificial Intelligence  
  8. Greek scepticism: anti-realist trends in ancient thought
  9. Abductive inference: computation
  10. Cognitive carpentry
  11. Prakken, H., Reed, C. and D. Walton. 2003. Argumentation schemes and generalisations in reasoning about evide…
  12. Thorsrud, H. 2002. Cicero on his academic predecessors: the Fallibilism of Arcesilaus and Carneades. Journal …
    Journal of the History of Philosophy  
  13. Scare tactics: arguments that appeal to fear and threats
  14. Walton, D. 2011. Teleological argumentation to and from motives. Law, Probability and Risk 10(2011): 203–223.
    Law, Probability and Risk  
  15. Argumentation schemes