Revisiting Reverse Eikos : Dialectical Evaluation of a Rhetorical Argument

Henrike Jansen

doi:10.5325/philrhet.56.2.0168

Philosophy & Rhetoric Jul 2023

Revisiting Reverse Eikos : Dialectical Evaluation of a Rhetorical Argument

Henrike Jansen Leiden University

Abstract

ABSTRACT Reverse eikos (plausibility) arguments are notorious for reversing a reason that supports an accusation into a reason that denies this accusation. This article offers new insights on their analysis and evaluation, by reconstructing a reverse eikos argument’s line of reasoning as an argumentative pattern. The pattern reveals that this type of argument centers not only on the arguer’s claim that by doing the act of which they have been accused, they would risk becoming the likely suspect, but also on the connected reasoning that they would not want to risk this since that would be stupid and they are not stupid. The proposed analysis, which is illustrated with classic and modern examples of reverse eikos arguments, shows that the evaluation of these arguments boils down to estimating the arguer’s calculation of the costs and benefits of taking the risk, while taking into account the arguer’s character, intellect, and circumstances.

Journal: Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published: 2023-07-31
DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.56.2.0168
CompPile
Open Access: Closed
Topics: rhetorical criticism assessment
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (26) · 5 in this index

Antiphon (1953)

Minor Attic Orators. Volume I: Antiphon, Andocides
Aristotle (1975)

“Art” of Rhetoric
(2007)

On Rhetoric: A Theory on Civic Discourse
(1990)

“The Nature of Proofs in Antiphon.”

Classical Philology ↗
(1994)

Persuasion: Greek Rhetoric in Action

Show all 26 →

(2001)

“Did the Sophists Aim to Persuade?”

Rhetorica ↗
(2007)

A Companion to Greek Rhetoric
(1989)

“Probability in the Earliest Rhetorical Theory.”

Mnemosyne
(2003)

Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation
Hoffman (2008)

Concerning Eikos: Social Expectation and Verisimilitude in Early Attic Rhetoric

Rhetorica
(2008)

“Murder in Sophistopolis: Paradox and Probability in the First Tetralogy.”

Argumentation and Advocacy ↗
Jacob (1996)

What if Aristotle took sophists seriously? New readings in Aristotle'srhetoric

Rhetoric Review
Jansen (2023)

High Costs and Low Benefits: Analysis and Evaluation of the “I’m Not Stupid” Argument

Argumentation
(1963)

The Art of Persuasion in Greece
(2007)

Aristotle: On Rhetoric
(2007)

Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground
(2010)

“Perelman’s Interpretation of Reverse Probability Arguments as a Dialectical Mise en Abyme.”

Philosophy & Rhetoric
(1969)

The New Rhetoric
Plato (1914/1999)

Plato: Euthyphro. Apology. Crito. Phaedo. Phaedrus
(2000)

“Plausibility in the Greek Orators.”

American Journal of Philology ↗
(2001)

Encyclopedia of Rhetoric
(2010)

Reason’s Dark Champions: Constructive Strategies of Sophistic Argument
(2017)

Prototypical Argumentative Patterns
(2016)

Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation
Walton (2019)

Plausible Argumentation in Eikotic Arguments: The Ancient Weak Versus Strong Ma…

Argumentation
Walton et al. (2014)

Applying Recent Argumentation Methods to Some Ancient Examples of Plausible Reasoning

Argumentation

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Revisiting Reverse Eikos : Dialectical Evaluation of a Rhetorical Argument

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

References (26) · 5 in this index

Related Articles