Argumentation Dec 2023 Open Access

High Costs and Low Benefits: Analysis and Evaluation of the “I’m Not Stupid” Argument

Henrike Jansen Leiden University

Abstract

AbstractThis article presents an analysis and evaluation of what I call the “I’m not stupid” argument. This argument has ancient roots, which lie in Aristotle’s famous description of the weak man’s and strong man’s arguments. An “I’m not stupid” argument is typically used in a context of accusation and defense, by a defendant who argues that they did not commit the act of which they have been accused. The analysis of this type of argument takes the shape of an argumentative pattern, which displays a full-fledged representation of its argumentation structure. It is based on a collection of ten contemporary instances of the “I’m not stupid” argument. Although ten instances constitute a small collection, the wide variation in the argumentative elements that they express explicitly or leave implicit made it possible to identify five new key premises in comparison with previous analyses of the weak man’s and strong man’s arguments (Walton, Tindale and Gordon 2014 in Argumentation 28:85–119, 2014; Walton 2019 in Argumentation 33:45–74, 2019). These new premises show that the crucial point of an evaluation of this argument is the arguer's supposedly rational character in making a gain-loss calculation. They also show that we need empirical data to strengthen our analyses of argument schemes and argumentation structures.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2023-12-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-022-09592-4
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
classical rhetoric argument assessment
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Jansen (2023)
    Revisiting Reverse Eikos : Dialectical Evaluation of a Rhetorical Argument
    Philosophy & Rhetoric

References (31) · 4 in this index

  1. Robert J Bonner (1927)
    Lawyers and litigants in ancient Athens
  2. Braet (2004)
    The Oldest Typology of Argumentation Schemes
    Argumentation
  3. Cicero. 2006; 1st ed. 1949. On Invention. English translation by H.M. Hubbell. The Loeb Classical Library 386…
     ↗
  4. William D Fairchild (1979)
    Fairchild, William D. 1979. The argument from probability in Lysias. Classical Bulletin 55: 49–54.
    Classical Bulletin
  5. Freese, John H. 1975. Aristotle: The “art” of rhetoric. English translation of Aristotle’s text; Loeb Classic…
Show all 31 →
  1. Michael Gagarin (1990)
    Gagarin, Michael. 1990. The nature of proofs in Antiphon. Classical Philology 85: 22–32.
    Classical Philology  ↗
  2. Michael Gagarin (1994)
    Persuasion Greek rhetoric in action
  3. Michael Gagarin (2001)
    Gagarin, Michael. 2001. Did the Sophists aim to persuade? Rhetorica 19: 275–291.
    Rhetorica  ↗
  4. Michael Gagarin (2002)
    Antiphon the Athenian: Oratory, law, and justice in the age of the sophists
     ↗
  5. Michael Gagarin (2007)
    A companion to Greek rhetoric
  6. Hoffman (2008)
    Concerning Eikos: Social Expectation and Verisimilitude in Early Attic Rhetoric
    Rhetorica
  7. Hoffman, David, C. 2003. Reversing perceptions of probability through self-referential argument: Interpretati…
  8. van Hoogstraten, Diederik. 2009. Noem me oplichter, maar geen schurk [Call me a crook, but not a villain]. In…
  9. Henrike Jansen (2011)
    Proceedings of the seventh conference of the International Society for the Study of Argum…
  10. Henrike Jansen (2015)
    Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice
     ↗
  11. Jansen, Henrike (submitted manuscript). Revisiting reverse eikos: Dialectical evaluation of a rhetorical argument.
  12. George A Kennedy (1963)
    The art of persuasion in Greece
  13. George A Kennedy (1994)
    A new history of classical rhetoric
  14. George A Kennedy (2007)
    Aristotle: On rhetoric. Translated with an introduction, notes, and appendices
  15. Kraus, Manfred. 2007. Early Greek probability arguments and common ground in dissensus. In Dissensus and the …
  16. Rackham, Harris. 1965; 1st ed. 1937. [Aristotle:] Rhetoric to Alexander. English translation of this text. Th…
  17. Rhetorica ad Herennium. 2004; 1st ed. 1954. English translation by Harry Caplan. The Loeb Classical Library 4…
  18. Thomas A Schmitz (2000)
    Schmitz, Thomas A. 2000. Plausibility in the Greek orators. American Journal of Philology 121: 47–77.
    American Journal of Philology  ↗
  19. Sloane, Thomas O. 2001. Encyclopedia of rhetoric. Oxford [etc.]: Oxford University Press.
  20. Christopher W Tindale (2010)
    Reason’s dark champions. Constructive strategies of sophistic argument
  21. Frans H van Eemeren (2017)
    Prototypical argumentative patterns
     ↗
  22. Frans H van Eemeren (2016)
    Argumentation: Analysis and evaluation
     ↗
  23. Frans H van Eemeren (1992)
    Argumentation, communication, and fallacies A pragma-dialectical perspective
  24. Walton (2019)
    Plausible Argumentation in Eikotic Arguments: The Ancient Weak Versus Strong Ma…
    Argumentation
  25. Douglas van Walton (2008)
    Argumentation schemes
     ↗
  26. Walton et al. (2014)
    Applying Recent Argumentation Methods to Some Ancient Examples of Plausible Reasoning
    Argumentation
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 2022
    Changing Climate, Changing Terrain: The Stasis Metaphor and the Climate Crisis ↗
    Shelton Weech
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism argument assessment technical communication
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric Nov 2020
    Rhetoric and Demagoguery ↗
    Fielding Montgomery
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument assessment qualitative research gender and writing public rhetoric
  3. Rhetorica Jan 2020
    From Humanism to Hobbes: Studies in Rhetoric and Politics by Quentin Skinner ↗
    Kathy Eden
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism argument assessment
  4. Philosophy & Rhetoric Nov 2019
    Angry Public Rhetorics: Global Relations and Emotion in the Wake of 9/11 ↗
    Michael William Pfau
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument collaborative writing assessment empirical research public rhetoric affect and writing body and rhetoric book reviews editorial matter
  5. Philosophy & Rhetoric Nov 2019
    Plato on the Value of Philosophy: The Art of Argument in the Gorgias and Phaedrus ↗
    Nicholas Rynearson
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism argument assessment affect and writing