David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (eds): Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation

Lester C. van der Pluijm; Jacky C. Visser

doi:10.1007/s10503-011-9214-y

Argumentation Nov 2011 Open Access

David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (eds): Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation

Lester C. van der Pluijm University of Amsterdam ; Jacky C. Visser

Abstract

Few academic contributions have been as influential in the field of argumentation theory as the work of Stephen E. Toulmin. His model of argument as well as his general insights and approach are still used as a point of departure and highly valued after more than half a century. Because of the important, central position of Toulmin's work within argumentation theory, the publication of a volume compiling the most eloquent contemporary essays inspired by Toulmin can come as no surprise.

Journal: Argumentation
Published: 2011-11-01
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-011-9214-y
CompPile
Open Access: OA PDF Hybrid
Topics: argument assessment
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (18) · 8 in this index

Aberdein (2005)

The Uses of Argument in Mathematics

Argumentation
Bermejo-Luque, L. 2004. Toulmin’s model of argument and the question of relativism. Informal Logic 24(2): 169–181.

↗
SK Foss (1991)

Contemporary perspectives on rhetoric
Freeman (2005)

Systematizing Toulmin’s Warrants: An Epistemic Approach

Argumentation
Hitchcock (2005)

Good Reasoning on the Toulmin Model

Argumentation

Show all 18 →

Loui (2005)

A Citation-based Reflection on Toulmin and Argument

Argumentation
Perelman, Ch., L. Olbrecht-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Trans. Notre Dame: Un…
RC Pinto (2006)

Pinto, R.C. 2006. Evaluating inferences: The nature and role of warrants. Informal Logic 26(3): 287–317.

Informal Logic ↗
JL Pollock (1986)

Contemporary theories of knowledge
Prakken (2005)

AI & Law, Logic and Argument Schemes

Argumentation
Reed et al. (2005)

Translating Toulmin Diagrams: Theory Neutrality in Argument Representation

Argumentation
SE Toulmin (1958)

The uses of argument
Toulmin, S.E. 2004. Reasoning in theory and practice. Informal Logic 24(2): 111–114.
van Eemeren, F.H., R. Grootendorst and T. Kruiger. 1978. Argumentatietheorie. [Argumentation Theory.] Utrecht…
van Eemeren, F.H., B. Garssen, T. van Haaften, E.C.W. Krabbe, A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, and J.H.M. Wagemans. 201…

↗
FH Eemeren van (1996)

Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contempora…
Verheij (2005)

Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme

Argumentation
Voss (2005)

Toulmin’s Model and the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems

Argumentation

CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network → Build reading path →

David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (eds): Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

References (18) · 8 in this index

Related Articles