David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (eds): Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation

Lester C. van der Pluijm; Jacky C. Visser

doi:10.1007/s10503-011-9214-y

Argumentation Nov 2011 Open Access

David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (eds): Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation

Lester C. van der Pluijm University of Amsterdam ; Jacky C. Visser

Abstract

Few academic contributions have been as influential in the field of argumentation theory as the work of Stephen E. Toulmin. His model of argument as well as his general insights and approach are still used as a point of departure and highly valued after more than half a century. Because of the important, central position of Toulmin's work within argumentation theory, the publication of a volume compiling the most eloquent contemporary essays inspired by Toulmin can come as no surprise.

Journal: Argumentation
Published: 2011-11-01
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-011-9214-y
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: OA PDF Hybrid
Topics: argument assessment
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (8)

Aberdein (2005)

The Uses of Argument in Mathematics

Argumentation
Freeman (2005)

Systematizing Toulmin’s Warrants: An Epistemic Approach

Argumentation
Hitchcock (2005)

Good Reasoning on the Toulmin Model

Argumentation
Loui (2005)

A Citation-based Reflection on Toulmin and Argument

Argumentation
Prakken (2005)

AI & Law, Logic and Argument Schemes

Argumentation

Show all 8 →

Reed et al. (2005)

Translating Toulmin Diagrams: Theory Neutrality in Argument Representation

Argumentation
Verheij (2005)

Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme

Argumentation
Voss (2005)

Toulmin’s Model and the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems

Argumentation

Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓

Bermejo-Luque, L. 2004. Toulmin’s model of argument and the question of relativism. Informal Logic 24(2): 169–181.

↗
RC Pinto (2006)

Pinto, R.C. 2006. Evaluating inferences: The nature and role of warrants. Informal Logic 26(3): 287–317.

Informal Logic ↗
van Eemeren, F.H., B. Garssen, T. van Haaften, E.C.W. Krabbe, A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, and J.H.M. Wagemans. 201…

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network → Build reading path →

David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (eds): Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

Cites in this index (8)

Related Articles