Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules — Pinakes

Argumentation Aug 2010

Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules

Dale Hample University of Maryland, College Park

Journal: Argumentation
Published: 2010-08-01
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-010-9183-6
CompPile
Open Access: Closed
Topics: empirical research
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (4)

FH van Eemeren (1987)

Argument and critical practices
FH van Eemeren (2004)

A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach
FH van Eemeren (1993)

Reconstructing argumentative discourse
FH van Eemeren (1999)

van Eemeren, F.H., and P. Houtlosser. 1999. Strategic manoeuvering in argumentative discourse. Discourse Stud…

Discourse Studies ↗

CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →