Argumentation Mar 2009

Cogency in Motion: Critical Contextualism and Relevance

William Rehg Saint Louis University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2009-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-008-9114-y
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rehg (2011)
    Evaluating Complex Collaborative Expertise: The Case of Climate Change
    Argumentation

References (40) · 1 in this index

  1. Ian G Barbour (2000)
    When science meets religion
  2. Lloyd F Bitzer (1968)
    Bitzer, Lloyd F. 1968. The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 1: 1–14.
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
  3. Ann M Blakeslee (2001)
    Interacting with audiences
  4. Ricardo Blaug (1999)
    Democracy, real and ideal
  5. Broad, William J. 2007. From a rapt audience, a call to cool the hype. New York Times March 13.
Show all 40 →
  1. Cartwright, Nancy. 2006. Well-ordered science: Evidence for use. Philosophy of Science (PSA2004 Symposia Pape…
     ↗
  2. Frank Fischer (2000)
    Citizens, experts, and the environment
     ↗
  3. Harold Garfinkel (1967)
    Studies in ethnomethodology
  4. Michael A Gilbert (2007)
    Gilbert, Michael A. 2007. Natural normativity: Argumentation theory as engaged discipline. Informal Logic 27:…
    Informal Logic  ↗
  5. (1994)
    The mass-extinction debates
  6. Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. Moral consciousness and communicative action (trans: Lenhardt, C. and Nicholsen, S.W.…
  7. Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between facts and norms (trans: Rehg, W.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     ↗
  8. John F Haught (2000)
    God after Darwin
  9. Stephen Hilgartner (2000)
    Science on stage
     ↗
  10. Hitchcock (1992)
    Relevance
    Argumentation
  11. David Hull (1988)
    Science as a process
     ↗
  12. Sheila Jasanoff (1990)
    The fifth branch
  13. Ralph H Johnson (2000)
    Manifest rationality
  14. Kathleen Jordan (1992)
    The right tools for the job
     ↗
  15. Evelyn Fox Keller (1983)
    A feeling for the organism
  16. Kourany, Janet A. 2006. Getting philosophy of science socially connected. Philosophy of Science (PSA2004 Symp…
     ↗
  17. Martin Kusch (2002)
    Knowledge by agreement
     ↗
  18. Joseph Lewandowski (2001)
    Interpreting culture
  19. Eric Livingston (1987)
    Making sense of ethnomethodology
  20. Michael Lynch (1993)
    Scientific practice and ordinary action
  21. John E McPeck (1990)
    Teaching critical thinking
  22. Kenneth R Miller (1999)
    Finding Darwin’s God
  23. Greg Myers (1990)
    Writing biology
  24. William Rehg (1997)
    Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in our time
  25. William Rehg (2005)
    Rehg, William. 2005. Assessing the cogency of arguments: Three kinds of merits. Informal Logic 25: 95–115.
    Informal Logic
  26. William Rehg (2009)
    Cogent science in context
  27. Kent W Staley (2004)
    The evidence for the top quark
  28. Christopher W Tindale (1999)
    Acts of arguing
  29. Stephen E Toulmin (1958)
    The uses of argument
  30. Stephen P Turner (2003)
    Liberal democracy 3.0
  31. Frans H Eemeren van (2004)
    A systematic theory of argumentation
  32. Douglas Walton (1996)
    A pragmatic theory of fallacy
  33. Douglas Walton (1998)
    The new dialectic
     ↗
  34. Douglas Walton (2004)
    Relevance in argumentation
  35. John Ziman (1968)
    Public knowledge
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network → Build reading path →