Argumentation Aug 2011 Open Access

Evaluating Complex Collaborative Expertise: The Case of Climate Change

William Rehg UCLouvain Saint-Louis Brussels

Abstract

Science advisory committees exercise complex collaborative expertise. Not only do committee members collaborate, they do so across disciplines, producing expert reports that make synthetic multidisciplinary arguments. When reports are controversial, critics target both report content and committee process. Such controversies call for the assessment of expert arguments, but the multidisciplinary character of the debate outstrips the usual methods developed by informal logicians for assessing appeals to expert authority. This article proposes a multi-dimensional contextualist framework for critical assessment and tests it with a case study of the controversies over reports issued by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The case study shows (1) how the critical contextualist framework can illuminate the controversy and guide evaluation of the various arguments and counterarguments; (2) how cases of this sort open up avenues for fruitful interdisciplinary collaboration between argumentation theorists and other fields; and (3) where further work is required in argumentation theory.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2011-08-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-011-9223-x
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
argument collaborative writing assessment qualitative research
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Mercier (2011)
    When Experts Argue: Explaining the Best and the Worst of Reasoning
    Argumentation
  2. Rehg (2009)
    Cogency in Motion: Critical Contextualism and Relevance
    Argumentation
Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓
  1. B Bolin (2007)
    A history of the science and politics of climate change
     ↗
  2. MT Boykoff (2007)
    Boykoff, M.T. 2007. Flogging a dead norm? Media coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States…
    Area  ↗
  3. MT Boykoff (2004)
    Boykoff, M.T., and J.M. Boykoff. 2004. Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global envi…
    Global environmental change  ↗
  4. H Collins (2007)
    Rethinking expertise
     ↗
  5. Kincaid, H., J. Dupré, and A. Wylie, eds. 2007. Value-free science? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     ↗
  6. M Lahsen (2008)
    Lahsen, M. 2008. Experiences of modernity in the greenhouse: A cultural analysis of the physicists’ “trio” su…
    Global Environmental Change  ↗
  7. Lemonick, M. D. 2010. Climate heretic: Judith Curry turns on her colleagues. Scientific American. Oct 25 2010…
     ↗
  8. Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2011. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral an…
     ↗
  9. RA Pielke Jr (2007)
    The honest broker
     ↗
  10. Weiss, P. 1996. Industry group assails climate chapter. Science 272/5269: 1734.
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Writing Center Journal 2014
    Questioning in Writing Center Conferences ↗
    Isabelle Thompson; Jo Mackiewicz
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis teacher development argument collaborative writing assessment writing centers peer tutoring qualitative research
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Sep 2025
    Professionalizing Researchers: Mapping and Visualizing Doctoral Engineering Student Identity Development Through User-Experience (UX) Methods ↗
    Jason Tham; Diego A. Polanco-Lahoz; Madison Hanson; Jennifer Cross; Mario Beruvides
    curriculum design graduate education collaborative writing assessment empirical research qualitative research
  3. Argumentation Aug 2025
    Informal Formative Assessment in Argumentation-Based Science Education: A Micro-Analytic Investigation of Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices ↗
    Metin Sardag; Gultekin Cakmakci
    discourse analysis writing pedagogy argument assessment professional writing empirical research qualitative research
  4. Pedagogy Oct 2024
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education two-year college service learning teacher development revision argument collaborative writing assessment writing program administration multimodality multilingual writers literacy studies race and writing disability studies community literacy editorial matter
  5. Pedagogy Oct 2023
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy writing across the curriculum two-year college teacher development collaborative writing assessment writing centers qualitative research multimodality literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies affect and writing literary studies book reviews editorial matter