Argumentation Dec 2006 Open Access

Preface

Frans H. Van Eemeren ; Peter Houtlosser University of Amsterdam

Abstract

During the last decade we have been working, together with colleagues interested in this endeavor, on an extension of the ''standard'' pragmadialectical theory of argumentation developed by van Eemeren and Grootendorst by integrating insights from classical and modern rhetoric.This integration of rhetorical insight in a dialectical theoretical framework was motivated by our wish to improve the quality of a pragma-dialectical analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse.The integration was brought about with the help of the introduction of the notion of ''strategic maneuvering,'' which designates the balancing act of reconciling the simultaneous pursuit of dialectical and rhetorical objectives that arguers have to perform in the conduct of argumentative discourse.Even if they are in the first place out to fulfill their dialectical obligations in the explicit or implicit exchange, they may still be expected to be aiming at realizing the rhetorical aspirations that go with entering an argument; and if they are in the first place led by their rhetorical aspirations, they still cannot ignore the dialectical obligations that they have to meet when entering an argument.These considerations concerning the ''double'' concern that arguers may be assumed to have are at the heart of our efforts to develop an extended pragma-dialectical theory.They are also the starting point for this special issue of the journal Argumentation in which authors from various theoretical backgrounds -which may be quite different from our pragma-dialectical position -offer, from their specific vantage points, their ''Perspectives on Strategic Maneuvering.''The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, NWO, granted us a substantial subsidy to further develop our ideas concerning strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse, in particular by examining the strategic function of maneuvering that consists in pointing out an inconsistency in the other partyÕs position and formulating the soundness conditions applying to that way of maneuvering (research program no. 360-80-030).Apart from involving four excellent PhD students and a post-doctoral researcher in the project, this subsidy allowed us also, just as we intended, to organize a series of small-scale and clearly focused conferences dedicated to specific aspects of strategic maneuvering.At these conferences scholars of argumentation interested in any of these specific aspects could discuss their views with other interested parties and contribute in this way to the progress of our project, not in the last place by criticizing some of our points of departure and offering constructive alternatives.The first

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2006-12-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-007-9032-4
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis graduate education argument assessment editorial matter
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Dougherty (2019)
    The Pernicious Effects of Compression Plagiarism on Scholarly Argumentation
    Argumentation
  2. Mitchell (2010)
    Higher-Order Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentation
    Argumentation

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Pedagogy Jan 2022
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis african american rhetorics decolonial rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education teacher development argument collaborative writing transfer assessment portfolios writing program administration writing centers peer tutoring technical communication professional writing archival research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric community literacy literary studies editorial matter
  2. Advances in the History of Rhetoric Apr 2015
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis graduate education argument assessment multimodality public rhetoric editorial matter
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric Nov 2019
    Angry Public Rhetorics: Global Relations and Emotion in the Wake of 9/11 ↗
    Michael William Pfau
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument collaborative writing assessment empirical research public rhetoric affect and writing body and rhetoric book reviews editorial matter
  4. Philosophy & Rhetoric Feb 2017
    In Memoriam: Lloyd Bitzer (1931–2016) ↗
    Gerard Hauser
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism graduate education teacher development argument assessment public rhetoric editorial matter
  5. Philosophy & Rhetoric Oct 2025
    The Intellectual and Cultural Origins of Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s New Rhetoric Project: Commentaries on and Translations of Seven Foundational Articles, 1933–1958 ↗
    Christopher W. Tindale
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis revision argument collaborative writing editorial matter