360° Video for Research Communication and Dissemination: A Case Study and Guidelines

Daniel Wuebben Universidad Rey Juan Carlos ; Jose Luis Rubio-Tamayo ; Manuel Gertrudix Barrio ; Juan Romero-Luis Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Introduction:</b> 360° videos are increasingly popular channels for science communication and higher education; however, time-limited 360° videos that disseminate scientific research via platforms like YouTube remain underexamined. To address this problem, this experience report reviews the creation and evaluation of six 2D video interviews and six 360° video tours. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">About the case:</b> The European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) and other public-facing organizations already publish 2D videos on social media channels and host 360° video content on their institutional websites. This case addresses the affordances and constraints of creating short 360° videos for publication on public-facing platforms. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Situating the case:</b> 360° video content has been incorporated into science communication and pedagogical practices in higher education. The authors review these developments and show the need for further research on time-limited 360° video. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Methods/approach:</b> Scientists researching energy-related technologies were invited to record 2D video interviews. Based on these interviews, six transcripts for 360° videos were drafted and recorded in the same lab settings. When the videos were published, European researchers and communication professionals were recruited to complete a short survey evaluating the videos’ relative merits. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Results/discussion:</b> The survey results (n = 32) suggest a similar overall quality of the 2D video interviews and 360° video tours. Respondents ranked the interviewee or narrator as the best feature of both the 2D and 360° format, and 47% said that they would prefer to have a 360° video created about their research. Based on our experience, we provide guidelines related to the production and publication of short 360° videos. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Conclusion:</b> Further research and practice are required to understand which specific features of the 360° videos are most effective and whether this technology offers distinct advantages as a tool for dissemination. Further research and practice will establish more detailed approaches to 360° video.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2023-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2022.3228022
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (65) · 1 in this index

  1. 10.3390/mti1040021
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. 10.4101/jvwr.v11i1.7298
  4. 10.1109/vr.2017.7892285
  5. 10.3200/envt.51.2.12-23
Show all 65 →
  1. 10.1080/19331681.2015.1034910
  2. 10.1002/wcc.569
  3. 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111490
  4. 10.1080/23808985.2015.11735267
  5. 10.1007/s10584-021-02975-8
  6. 10.3390/en14113089
  7. 10.1177/1075547019837620
  8. 10.1177/0963662515593841
  9. 10.1080/1461670x.2019.1568203
  10. 10.1080/1461670x.2018.1561208
  11. 10.1080/17524032.2019.1664607
  12. 10.1177/09610006211006774
  13. 10.3389/fcomm.2020.581585
  14. JoVE journals videos take strain out of new science
  15. Communication, dissemination and exploitation strategy analysis in horizon 2020: Keys to …
    Prisma Soc. J.
  16. Take a 360 tour to the European commission JRC visitors centre
  17. Vanesa ruiz ruiz: Materials scientist
  18. 10.3791/57501
  19. Take a virtual tour of the battery testing facilities laboratory
  20. 10.1177/0020731416676227
  21. 10.5588/pha.16.0090
  22. 10.1002/asi.22717
  23. 10.12928/telkomnika.v17i3.10124
  24. 10.3389/fcomm.2020.567606
  25. 10.3389/fcomm.2020.575122
  26. 10.1177/0963662521990848
  27. 10.1007/s13278-020-00716-w
  28. 10.3389/fcomm.2021.586297
  29. 10.1177/0963662515572068
  30. 10.3389/fcomm.2020.581349
  31. VR 360 multimedia for planetarium shows and informal education
  32. Science 360
  33. 10.1007/s11266-020-00280-z
  34. 10.1038/s41598-017-01242-0
  35. Fly through a colossal cave: Son Doong in 360
  36. Global environments: A 360o visual journey
  37. 10.4148/1051-0834.2395
  38. 10.1177/1075547020932174
  39. 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.066
  40. 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.102
  41. 10.2147/amep.s321885
  42. 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104145
  43. 10.7861/fhj.2019-0036
  44. 10.1007/s10916-018-0900-2
  45. 10.1007/s10880-011-9247-2
  46. Using 360 video in physical education teacher education
  47. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00143
  48. 10.1080/10494820.2020.1863234
  49. 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.021
  50. 10.1080/10494820.2019.1579234
  51. 10.1080/10447318.2021.1913858
  52. 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.015
  53. 10.1109/vr.2016.7504701
  54. 10.1109/vr.2017.7892384
  55. 10.15198/seeci.2021.54.e720
  56. Making the most of your H2020 project: Boosting the impact of your project through effect…
  57. 10.3390/su132313116
  58. Horizon results platform
  59. 10.22323/2.15040202
  60. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method