Coding Equity: Social Justice and Computer Programming Literacy Education

Ashley Rea Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University

Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><i>Background:</i></b> Computer programming faces persistent problems of inequity. In response, bootcamps and workshops have rapidly responded by offering an introduction to coding literacy intended to increase access and representation in the tech industry. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><i>Literature review:</i></b> Prior research on software development focuses primarily on workplace contexts. This study considers bootcamps and workshops outside the workplace for minoritized and marginalized software developers to better understand the institutional contexts in which programming is taught and made. In so doing, it contributes to ongoing conversations on strategies for social justice in technical communication. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><i>Research questions:</i></b> 1. How do bootcamps and workshops function as sites of coding education? 2. What strategies do activist programmers use in bootcamps and workshops to work towards social justice goals? <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><i>Methodology:</i></b> For this research, I interviewed organizers, instructors, and participants at three coding workshops and bootcamps for marginalized communities. I also conducted participant observation of the workshops, collected educational materials, and analyzed the interview transcripts using a grounded theory approach. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><i>Results and discussion:</i></b> This analysis revealed how coding workshops and bootcamps operate as literacy sponsors, contributing to a transformative access for participants. More specifically, my research describes how activist programmers craft open, inclusive, and culturally aware pedagogies by attending to access, representation, community, and active learning, ultimately facilitating an affective coding literacy.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2022-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2022.3143965
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (17)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. College English
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 17 →
  1. Literacy in Composition Studies
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  8. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  9. Literacy in Composition Studies
  10. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  11. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  12. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 19 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.7551/mitpress/10655.001.0001
  2. 10.4324/9780429198748
  3. 10.7330/9781607327585.c010
  4. 10.3998/mpub.10019291
  5. 10.18574/nyu/9781479833641.001.0001
  6. 10.1007/s11218-012-9185-3
  7. 10.1109/MITP.2018.021921655
  8. 10.2307/358929
  9. 10.4324/9781410617385
  10. 10.2979/meridians.15.1.05
  11. 10.4135/9781526402196
  12. 10.1017/cbo9781316106372
  13. 10.1109/RITA.2017.2658918
  14. 10.3167/latiss.2013.060307
  15. 10.1207/s15548430jlr3403_4
  16. 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
  17. 10.7330/9781607325239.c006
  18. 10.1177/0162243920912824
  19. 10.1111/gwao.12440