A Content Analysis of Figure Captions in Academic Journals from Four Disciplines

Jordan Smith University of North Texas

Abstract

Background: Captions do important communicative work, but little research has investigated their content quantitatively. Literature review: Captions help facilitate learning and make retrieving information from databases easier. Yet, few studies have explored the rhetorical moves found in figure captions to better understand their communicative function. Research questions: 1. How do captions found in psychology, linguistics, biology, and technical and professional communication (TPC) journals differ in terms of length? 2. What are the rhetorical structures of figure captions in psychology, linguistics, biology, and TPC journals? 3. How do the rhetorical structures of captions in journals from these four disciplines differ? 4. To what extent does visual type interact with caption length and rhetorical structure? Research methodology: Using quantitative content analysis, I compared the frequencies of moves in captions across disciplines, determined whether the moves were conventional or optional, and identified patterns in the progression of moves in the captions that I analyzed. A supplementary analysis of the types of visuals that accompanied the captions offered insights into the findings of the caption-content analysis. Results: Results suggest a high degree of variation in the rhetorical structure of captions in academic journals. Biology captions were, on average, the longest and contained the most moves. TPC captions were the shortest and contained the fewest moves. Psychology and linguistics captions fell between the biology and TPC captions. Conclusions: Understanding variation in caption content can encourage a more rhetorical approach to caption writing. Researchers in disciplines where shorter captions are standard might consider writing elaborated captions.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2020-12-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2020.3032049
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 6 →
  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Also cites 32 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.03.005
  2. 10.1037/a0037840
  3. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00194.x
  4. 10.1177/1461445605050365
  5. 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032210-104535
  6. 10.7554/eLife.00117
  7. 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.02.001
  8. 10.1016/0019-8501(86)90034-9
  9. 10.1002/0471445428
  10. 10.1177/1461445612466468
  11. 10.1111/add.12008
  12. 10.5153/sro.964
  13. 10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.715
  14. 10.1080/10862968809547641
  15. 10.3366/cor.2013.0039
  16. 10.1145/956804.956809
  17. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.004
  18. 10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.64
  19. 10.1177/0092070303257856
  20. 10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.001
  21. 10.1016/j.jretai.2012.02.001
  22. 10.1016/j.jretai.2011.05.002
  23. 10.2307/20721420
  24. 10.1111/j.1467-8535.1990.tb00040.x
  25. 10.1002/cb.1372
  26. Multimodal comprehension of language and graphics: Graphs with and without annotations
    J Eye Movement Res  
  27. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth316
  28. 10.1075/idj.19.2.06des
  29. 10.1186/1741-7007-9-87
  30. 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00026-4
  31. 10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
  32. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.004