Abstract

Background: This article argues for the intersection of intercultural technical and professional communication (TPC), contrastive rhetoric, and corpus linguistics as a powerful alliance to perform application-oriented genre analysis. Literature review: Research into technical and professional communication has long been interested in genre analysis from an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) approach. Genres are a frequent form of professional communication; reports, in particular, have received great attention in the field of English for Business Purposes (EBP). Nevertheless, existing research has criticized that many ESP/EBP coursebooks are not really tailored to the trade, let alone contain the language used in real-life professional settings. Consequently, specialized corpora for genre description pertain. Aim: This study analyzes the audit report business genre to develop applications of language use for EBP learners. Research questions: 1. What characterizes the audit report (AuR) genre macrostructure in English (EN) and Spanish (ES)? 2. Are there noticeable differences between EN and ES in terms of genre realization? 3. How can the findings of descriptive research be applied in professional contexts? Method: An ad-hoc comparable corpus of authentic AuRs was compiled, tagged at the rhetorical level and browsed following a top-down procedure. First, the macrostructure of the AuR was pinned down and then compared cross-linguistically in search of similarities and differences. Then auditors’ self-mention markers and verbs referring to their tasks were examined. Results: Minor differences were observed at the rhetorical level, as opposed to the findings at the level of grammatical realization. A two-fold proposal is made to transfer descriptive knowledge to an ESP educational setting and to the workplace.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2024.3415242
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (9)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 9 →
  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 32 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.4324/9780203095324
  2. 10.1075/btl.158.06per
  3. 10.1093/applin/1.1.1
  4. 10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00022-3
  5. 10.1016/j.esp.2009.07.001
  6. 10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.003
  7. 10.1016/j.esp.2007.07.005
  8. 10.1075/pbns.47
  9. 10.4324/9781315838069
  10. 10.3726/978-3-0351-0410-3
  11. 10.1108/00220410610700953
  12. 10.1016/0889-4906(91)90004-G
  13. 10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00024-7
  14. 10.1016/j.esp.2021.12.002
  15. 10.1016/j.esp.2022.11.007
  16. 10.1016/j.esp.2013.10.002
  17. 10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00028-4
  18. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.03.005
  19. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.06.004
  20. 10.4324/9780203015742
  21. 10.5040/9781472541611.ch-003
  22. 10.5040/9781472541611.ch-002
  23. 10.1093/llc/8.4.243
  24. 10.4324/9780203469255
  25. 10.1075/scl.16.02flo
  26. 10.1075/lic.16.2.03rab
  27. Contrasting Languages. The Scope of Contrastive Linguistics
  28. 10.4324/9781003002901-27
  29. 10.1111/lang.12224
  30. 10.1016/j.esp.2017.03.003
  31. 10.4324/9780429425899-2
  32. 10.1016/j.esp.2020.03.003